How do I solve this physics exercise (Equilibrium)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics exercise related to equilibrium involving cable tensions. The participant calculates that the 500-pound vertical load is supported entirely by cable CD, with 375 pounds distributed horizontally to the other two cables. Each of these cables, being symmetric, carries 187.5 pounds horizontally. Another participant confirms the calculations, arriving at a slightly different value of 197.64 pounds, suggesting minor discrepancies may be due to rounding. The consensus indicates that the original approach is largely correct, with only minor adjustments needed for precision.
Tapias5000
Messages
46
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Determine the force required on each cable to sustain the load of 500lb
Relevant Equations
Σfx=0, Σfy=0, Σfz=0
1632608403797.png

I tried to solve it and I got the following, is it correct?
aa.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks ok.

Insofar as 2 of the cables are in the horizontal plane, then the 500 pound vertical load must all be carried by the vertical comp of cable CD. And with that 3-4-5 triangle, 3 fourths of it or 375 pounds , must go horizontally to the other 2 cables, and their being symmetric, that’s half again or 187.5 borizontally to each, or cable tension root 10/3 times that. Saves a few lines. At least on this one.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Looks ok.

Insofar as 2 of the cables are in the horizontal plane, then the 500 pound vertical load must all be carried by the vertical comp of cable CD. And with that 3-4-5 triangle, 3 fourths of it or 375 pounds , must go horizontally to the other 2 cables, and their being symmetric, that’s half again or 187.5 borizontally to each, or cable tension root 10/3 times that. Saves a few lines. At least on this one.
Are my answers correct?
 
Tapias5000 said:
Are my answers correct?
Near enough. I get 197.64...
 
haruspex said:
Near enough. I get 197.64...
ooh... maybe then only decimals are involved in the procedure... well I'll settle for that
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to find the equilibrium position of three masses (two of them fixed)?
Replies
4
Views
2K
How to Solve Dynamics Exercise Involving Force Representation?
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
How Do You Solve a Non-Equilibrium Pulley System with a 154 Degree Angle?
Replies
10
Views
658
How to calculate the force exerted by the "tendon" on the "tibia" bone?
Replies
4
Views
946
Block A Reaches Equilibrium: 92N Force
Replies
5
Views
881
Solving Equilibrium w/ Plank & Forces | Physics Problem
Replies
7
Views
4K
Torque: find the force necessary for a body to be in equilibrium
Replies
6
Views
2K
Resistance Association - How to solve this exercise in the proper way?
Replies
2
Views
635
Understanding Exercise 3 and 8 in Freefall and Motion Law
Replies
8
Views
1K
How to solve this balancing exercise? (towing a boat with two ropes)
Replies
11
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top