How do I use inequalities to find f(3) when d is 5?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ilikebugs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using inequalities to determine the value of the function f(3) given that d is 5. Participants explore various methods to set up equations and inequalities based on known values of the function at specific points, focusing on the mathematical reasoning involved in finding f(3).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to use inequalities to find f(3) when d is known to be 5.
  • One participant suggests approximating f(4) and f(6) to facilitate solving for f(3).
  • Another participant proposes creating a set of equations based on known values of f at specific points.
  • There are discussions about the importance of integer coefficients a, b, c, and d in the equations.
  • Multiple participants present different forms of equations derived from the function f, leading to confusion about the correct expressions.
  • Some participants suggest simplifying expressions and substituting values to derive inequalities for f(4) and f(6).
  • There is a back-and-forth regarding the correctness of derived equations and the values of coefficients a, b, and c.
  • Eventually, a participant claims to have found values for a, b, c, and d, and calculates f(3) based on these values.
  • Another participant confirms the calculation of f(3) but points out that the crucial step of determining the values of a and b was not shown.
  • Further calculations are presented to justify the values of a and b based on inequalities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the method for determining f(3) using inequalities, as there are multiple approaches and some confusion regarding the equations. While some participants agree on the final values of a, b, c, and d, the process to arrive at those values remains contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the steps involved in deriving the inequalities and equations, and there are unresolved mathematical steps that depend on the assumptions made about the coefficients.

Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6582 I know that d is 5, but I don't know how to use the inequalities to find f(3)
 

Attachments

  • potw 9 2.png
    potw 9 2.png
    17.1 KB · Views: 116
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ilikebugs said:
I know that d is 5, but I don't know how to use the inequalities to find f(3)

Hey Ilikebugs,

Suppose we approximate f(4) and f(6) for now with, say, 45 respectively 245.
Could we solve it then?
 
I don't know how to solve that
 
Ilikebugs said:
I don't know how to solve that

Can we perhaps start by creating a set of equations?
 
You know that f(2)= 8a+ 4b+ 2c+ 5= -3 so that 4a+ 2b+ c= -4. From that, c= -4- 2b- 4a so we can write f(x)= ax^3+ bx^3- (4+ 2b+ 4a)x+ 5. So what is f(4)? What inequalities do you have for f(4)? Same for f(6).

Also, the fact that a, b, c, and d are integers is crucial.
 
I don't know, this is hard to do in my head. I got 8a^3+4b^2+2c+5=-3, 64a^3+16b^2+4c+5=45, and 216a^3+36b^2+6c+5=245
 
Last edited:
Ilikebugs said:
this is hard to do in my head.
You should do it on paper instead. (Smile)

Ilikebugs said:
I got 8a^3+4b^2+2c+5=-3, 64a^3+16b^2+4c+5=45, and 216a^3+36b^2+6c+5=245
How did you get $a^3$ if in the original formula for $f$ the coefficient $a$ is never raised to any power, only $x$ is.

Follow HallsofIvy's advice.
 
8a+4b+2c+5=-3
64a+16b+4c+5=45
216a+36b+6c+5=245

What do I do now?
 
HallsofIvy said:
What inequalities do you have for f(4)? Same for f(6).

Evgeny.Makarov said:
Follow HallsofIvy's advice.
Is there a reason you don't want to do this?

Ilikebugs said:
8a+4b+2c+5=-3
64a+16b+4c+5=45
216a+36b+6c+5=245
In general, if you had four equations $f(x_i)=y_i$, $i=1,\dots,4$ with known $x_i$ and $y_i$, you could write four linear equations in this way and thus find the coefficients $a,\dots,d$. Here, however, you have one equation, four inequalities and the stipulation that the coefficients are integer. This makes it a little trickier. But I still would first write the four inequalities on $a$ and $b$.
 
  • #10
f(0)=5
f(2)=8a+4b+2c+5=-3
40<f(4)=64a+16b+4c+5<50
240<f(6)=216a+36b+6c+5<250

Is this correct?
 
  • #11
Correct, but HallsofIvy also suggested expressing $c$ from the equation $f(2)=\ldots$ and substituting it in the inequalities.
 
  • #12
-4- 2b- 4a

f(0)=5
f(2)=8a+4b+2(-4- 2b- 4a)+5=-3
40<f(4)=64a+16b+4(-4- 2b- 4a)+5<50
240<f(6)=216a+36b+6(-4- 2b- 4a)+5<250

f(0)=5
f(2)=8a+4b+(-8- 4b- 8a)+5=-3
40<f(4)=64a+16b+(-16- 8b- 16a)+5<50
240<f(6)=216a+36b+(-24- 12b- 24a)+5<250

What do I do now?
 
  • #13
Simplify the last two lines.
 
  • #14
51<f(4)=48a+8b<61
259<f(6)=192a+24b<269
 
  • #15
Then I would multiply the first line by 3 to get
\begin{align}
153<&144a+24b<183\\
259<&192a+24b<269
\end{align}

Suppose in general that
\begin{align}
x&<\rlap{u}\hphantom{u+v}<y\\
x'&<u+v<y'
\end{align}
From the first line it follows that $-y<-u<-x$. Inequalities can be added: $a<b$ and $a'<b'$ imply that $a+a'<b+b'$. Adding $-y<-u<-x$ and $x'<u+v<y'$ produces
\[
x'-y<v<y'-x.
\]
Apply this fact to the first two (rather, four) inequalities in this post.
 
  • #16
How do I do that?

Is a=2 and b=-5 correct?
 
  • #17
Ilikebugs said:
Is a=2 and b=-5 correct?
Yes.

Ilikebugs said:
How do I do that?
Try to compare, or match,
\begin{align}
153<&144a+24b<183\\
259<&192a+24b<269
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
x&<\rlap{u}\hphantom{u+v}<y\\
x'&<u+v<y'
\end{align}
Such matching of your situation with a more general theorem assumption is how applying any theorem works in mathematics.
 
  • #18
a=2 b=-5 c=-2 d=5

f(3)=2(3)^3+(-5)(3)^2+(-2)(3)+5
=54-45-6+5
=8

Is this right?
 
  • #19
Yes, this is correct, but you didn't show the crucial step: how to determine $a=2$ and $b=-5$.
 
  • #20
153-144a<24b<183-144a
259<192a+24b<269

(259)-(183-144a)<192a<(269)-(153-144a)

66+144a<192a<116+144a
66<48a<116

Since a is an integer, a=2

Plugging in a into the 2 equations,

-135<24b<-105
-125<24b<-115

If b is an integer, b=-5
 
  • #21
All right. I took $u=144a+24b$. Then $u+v=192a+24b$ implies that $v=48a$. Thus $259-183=76<48a<116=269-153$, or $19<12a<29$, from where $a=2$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
203K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K