How Do I Use Unit Directional Vectors in Vector Calculus?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of unit directional vectors in vector calculus, particularly in the context of a problem that involves understanding their application and manipulation. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the unit directional vectors, specifically terms like a_rho and a_phi, and seeks clarification on how to approach the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to start the problem and considers using a matrix method. They express uncertainty about the role of unit directional vectors. Some participants suggest clarifying the coordinate system being used, questioning whether it is Cartesian or curvilinear, which could affect the interpretation of the unit vectors.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, with some providing insights into the nature of unit vectors and their relationships. There is a suggestion to post the problem as text for better clarity, and some guidance is offered regarding the analogy between unit vectors and standard basis vectors in Cartesian coordinates.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion arising from the use of rho and phi, which are typically associated with curvilinear coordinate systems, indicating that the original poster may need to clarify the type of coordinate system they are working with.

jmckennon
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Attached

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not quite sure how to start these. Once I figure out one of them, I should be able to do the rest. The confusing piece to me is with the unit directional vector (a_rho etc. My teacher has me horribly confused as to what I'm supposed to do with those terms. My initial idea is to use the matrix method for solving it. But I'm not sure. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • prob 2 19.JPG
    prob 2 19.JPG
    12 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
You might do better if you post your problem as text rather than an attachment - some folks are wary of them.
 
The unit vectors are just like regular vectors. You simply multiply the scalars which gives you the magnitude and then dot/cross the unit vectors (whichever applies).

I believe that a_rho, a_phi, z are analogous to \mathbf{i},\mathbf{j},\mathbf{k}, but don't quote me on that.

If you cross them from 'left to right' (i.e. i x j , j x k, x i) you get the positive 'next one' (i.e. k, i, j , respecively); if you cross them 'right to left' you get the negative 'next one.'

Example:

5\mathbf{i}\times6\mathbf{j}=((5)(6))(\mathbf{i}\times\mathbf{j})=30\mathbf{k}

And

3\mathbf{k}\times2\mathbf{j}=((3)(2))(\mathbf{k}\times\mathbf{j})=6(-\mathbf{i})=-6\mathbf{i}Assuming that a_\rho,a_\phi,z form a right-handed coordinate system, you can simply replace:

a_\rho=\mathbf{i}
a_\phi=\mathbf{j}
z=\mathbf{k}

in the preceding examples.
 
Last edited:
Is your co-ordinate system a Cartesian one - ie are the 3 axes at 90 degrees to each other, as in the usual convention of x, y and z axes?

The reason I ask is because the subscripts in your question, namely rho and phi, are more commonly used with curvilinear co-ordinate systems (these are co-ordinate systems that change as you travel along the curve under investigation).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K