parton
- 79
- 1
I want to determine the orbits of the proper orthochronous Lorentz group SO^{+}(1,3).
If I start with a time-like four-momentum p = (m, 0, 0, 0)
with positive time-component p^{0} = m > 0,
the orbit of SO^{+}(1,3) in p is given by:
\mathcal{O}(p) \equiv \lbrace \Lambda p \mid \Lambda \in SO^{+}(1,3) \rbrace
Now the point is: how do you show that
\mathcal{O}(p) = \lbrace q \mid q^{2} = m^{2}, q^{0} > 0 \rbrace ?
Essently, the question is: why does a Lorentz transformation \Lambda \in SO^{+}(1,3) exist
such that two four-vectors p and q with p^{2} = q^{2} = m^{2} and p^{0}, q^{0} > 0 are related via q = \Lambda p ?
In fact, it is possible to answer my question(s) by brute-force calculations. But I am searching for an "elegant way", e.g. with the help of group theory.
I already searched in the literature, but in most cases it seems to be "trivial" for the authors
and I see now explicit proof.
Does anyone know of anything like that?
If I start with a time-like four-momentum p = (m, 0, 0, 0)
with positive time-component p^{0} = m > 0,
the orbit of SO^{+}(1,3) in p is given by:
\mathcal{O}(p) \equiv \lbrace \Lambda p \mid \Lambda \in SO^{+}(1,3) \rbrace
Now the point is: how do you show that
\mathcal{O}(p) = \lbrace q \mid q^{2} = m^{2}, q^{0} > 0 \rbrace ?
Essently, the question is: why does a Lorentz transformation \Lambda \in SO^{+}(1,3) exist
such that two four-vectors p and q with p^{2} = q^{2} = m^{2} and p^{0}, q^{0} > 0 are related via q = \Lambda p ?
In fact, it is possible to answer my question(s) by brute-force calculations. But I am searching for an "elegant way", e.g. with the help of group theory.
I already searched in the literature, but in most cases it seems to be "trivial" for the authors
and I see now explicit proof.
Does anyone know of anything like that?