How Do Magnetic Dipole Moments Interact at a Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kylie14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interaction of two magnetic dipole moments, p1 and p2, separated by a distance r without external magnetic fields. It questions whether to calculate the energy of the interaction by treating each dipole in the magnetic field generated by the other or if both should be considered simultaneously. The derived equation for energy interaction is (-mu_0 / 2 pi r^3) p1 ∙ p2, which accounts for their orientation relative to each other. However, there is concern that this formula does not fully incorporate the orientation of each dipole with respect to the vector connecting them. The conversation highlights the complexities in accurately modeling magnetic dipole interactions.
kylie14
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Say you have two magnetic dipole moments, say p1 and p2, which are separated by a distance r, with no external magnetic fields.

If you want to figure out the energy of their magnetic interaction, is it valid to figure out the energy of p1 in the magnetic field generated by p2, or vice versa? Or will this not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, sorry, I think I was being stupid!
Do I consider it both ways round, so treat p1 as being in an external mag field (from p2), then p2 in an external field (from p1) and then sum the energies together?
 
I have an answer:
(-mu_0 / 2 pi r^3) p1 ∙ p2

I have a problem with this answer though; while it takes into account the orientation of the two with respect to each other, shouldn't it also take into account the orientation of each with the vector joining them?

My equation seems to agree with a general one I found, but only when assuming that p1 and p2 are parallel to to the vector joining them!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top