How do magnets affect boiling water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jammieg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boiling Water
AI Thread Summary
Bubbles in boiling water form at specific points due to irregularities in the pot's surface, such as scratches, which act as nucleation sites. The initial large bubbles shrink as they rise because the surrounding water is below boiling temperature. When magnets are placed at the bottom of the pot, they attract particles that may enhance bubble formation around them. The magnets could also have a different surface texture that contributes to this effect. This interaction between magnets and boiling water presents an intriguing phenomenon worth further exploration.
jammieg
Have you ever watched a pot of water boil? I'll bet you have, but did you notice how the bubbles start off at the bottom in just a few spots as if there were an air leak from the bottom of the pot and they start off really big and then almost instantly reduce in size so small sometimes you can't even see them before floating to the top, isn't that odd? What's going on here, what would cause a bubble to do that, this is no ordinary bubble.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The bubble is just water in the gas phase. At the point it is formed, the temperature exceeds the boiling point. But the liquid water above it is still below the boiling point. So as soon as it starts to rise, it shrinks and winks out.
 
When you say it is water in the gas phase, do you mean it is oxygen and hydrogen gas broken down or just water vaporized to a gaseous form and that it is actually the ascension of the bubble that rapidly cools and this is what accounts for the rapid size shift? The reason I ask is when i put some magnets in the bottom of the pot a curious thing happened I can't explain but all the bubbles formed around the magnets, if the hottest areas give rise to the gaseous bubbles, it would seem that additional magnets would just give greater surface area and be cooler regions of the pot, I don't know about the thermal properties of standard magnets though, odd though isn't it?
 
jammieg said:
The reason I ask is when i put some magnets in the bottom of the pot a curious thing happened I can't explain but all the bubbles formed around the magnets, if the hottest areas give rise to the gaseous bubbles, it would seem that additional magnets would just give greater surface area and be cooler regions of the pot, I don't know about the thermal properties of standard magnets though, odd though isn't it?

I think the bubbles start at irregularities in the surface of the pot, like scratches or sharp little protuberances. The magnets are likely to hold a lot of dust or other particles that can serve as nucleation sites for the bubbles. Also the magnets may be made of a material that has a coarser surface texture than the pot.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top