How do mesons not self-destruct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tinypositrons
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mesons
tinypositrons
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello physicists,

I was speaking to my friend about mesons when I realized that surely a meson would annihialate at creation due to the fact that it has a quark and anti-quark. I know it doesn't, but I'm wondering why. Clarrification on this would be great.

Thanks,
Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well they do. Depending of course on what you mean by "annihilation".

All mesons decay. Most mesons consist of a quark and antiquark of different types, although some do contain a quark and antiquark of the same variety (see "quarkonium").

But remember that annihilation is not an instantaneous process, e.g. an electron-positron pair can form a bound state, positronium, which lasts for ~ 10-10 sec (that's a pretty long time!) before decaying.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top