How Do Oily Fingers Affect Hydrated Salt Mass Measurement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter disneychannel
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Handling the crucible with oily fingers contaminates its surface, which can lead to an inaccurate measurement of the hydrated salt mass. Although the initial mass measurement of the crucible is accurate, the oil adds extra weight that will be lost during the burning process, resulting in an apparent increase in water loss. This contamination ultimately skews the reported percentage of water in the hydrated salt, making it seem higher than it actually is. To clarify the impact of this error, quantifying the mass of the oil could help illustrate its effect on the final results. Understanding this contamination is crucial for accurate analytical measurements in chemistry.
disneychannel
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The crucible is handled with oily fingers after its mass measurement but before the ~3 gram sample of the hydrated salt is measured. Subsequently(after measuring the hydrated salt,the oil is burned off. How does this technique error affect the reported % water in the hydrated salt. Explain


The Attempt at a Solution


The measurement of the crucible will be accurate, but after touching the crucible with the oily fingers, it will contaminate the surface of the crucible. After weighing the hydrated surface and then burning the crucible, it will seem that more water was lost because the oily fingers would have increased the mass of the hydrated salt.

I'm kind of having second thoughts on my answer...part of my mind thinks it will no be affected? HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your initial response is correct, now convince yourself of it to make sure you understand. Take it one step at a time to determine where the error is. If it helps, make up a number for the mass of the oily fingerprint so you can track its effect quantitatively.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top