How Do Quark-Antiquark Pairs Form Mesons in Electron-Positron Collisions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryDaniels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
HarryDaniels
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Edit, the title is electron, positron collision.
Sorry.

In the Feynmans Diagram involving a collision between a positron and a electron (or e+ and e-) a photon is generated and becomes a quark and anti-quark pair. Once these two are generate I know that one releases (radiates) a gluon. Can someone explain the formula and tell me whether or not this quark-antiquark pair use the gluon to become a meson?

Thank You
-Harry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


HarryDaniels said:
Edit, the title is electron, positron collision.
Sorry.

In the Feynmans Diagram involving a collision between a positron and a electron (or e+ and e-) a photon is generated and becomes a quark and anti-quark pair. Once these two are generate I know that one releases (radiates) a gluon. Can someone explain the formula and tell me whether or not this quark-antiquark pair use the gluon to become a meson?

Thank You
-Harry.
Which formula are you asking about exactly?

In your example, for low energies, the quark and antiquark could become a meson, but at higher energies they would fly apart and combine with additional quarks/antiquarks (possibly created from ambient virtual photons, a.k.a. vacuum fluctuations) to become two distinct showers of particles, called jets. The emitted gluon can even separate from the quark and antiquark and produce a jet of its own. This is called a "three-jet event" (technical term :wink: no, really!) and it's frequently seen at large particle accelerators.
 


Sorry,
I was thinking of another formula.
 
Another Electron-positron collision

In my A-level book there is a diagram of an electron and a positron colliding and forming two EM radiation photons which go off at a 90 degree angle away from the direction in which the electron/positron hit. My problem is that in the Feynman Diagram an electron and a positron hit and one photon is created which becomes a quark anti quark pair.

Can someone explain to me why these are different?
 
first you should not think of Feynman diagrams of what is actually going on, the angles and lines etc are not REAL.

Thus the diagram in you A level book is repsenting the momentum arrows in the centre of mass frame for the electron (positron) and the photons.

Feynman diagram are something else.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top