How Do S-Parameters Affect Attenuation in WG Transitions and Circulators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lennybogzy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between S-parameters and attenuation measurements in a setup involving waveguide transitions and circulators. Participants explore how these parameters may influence the observed differences in attenuation across multiple ports in a measurement system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a measurement setup involving a KU-band CW source, multiple waveguide transitions, and circulators, noting discrepancies in attenuation measurements across different ports.
  • Another participant suggests examining the S21 parameter to assess loss between transitions, while cautioning about potential calibration issues with a vector network analyzer (VNA).
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the impact of insertion loss on their readings, proposing that S11 and VSWR interactions might be responsible for the observed variations in attenuation after zeroing out insertion loss.
  • One participant introduces the concept of mismatch loss and its relation to S11, indicating that variations between devices could contribute to the differing attenuation readings.
  • A later reply confirms that moving the same device between ports still results in different readings, indicating a need to investigate mismatch loss further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the primary cause of the differing attenuation measurements, with multiple competing views regarding the roles of S21, S11, and mismatch loss remaining present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge potential complexities in calibrating measurement equipment and the influence of device variations on attenuation readings, but do not resolve these issues.

lennybogzy
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I was hoping someone might have some insight as to how I can correlate some attenuation measurements.

Here is my setup:

I have a KU-band CW source going into a 3-port switch, into 3 semi-rigid SMA's into 3 waveguide transitions, into 3 circulators, into 3 long pieces of waveguide. On the back end the three go into 3 more sets of circulators, transitions, SMA's and then back into a switch on which I have a power meter.

I can then switch between the three different paths and measure 3 DUT's, one at a time.

The issue that I have is that I have different attenuation measurements from port to port. Some can differ by as much as 1dB.

Here is my question:

I'm pretty sure it is the transitions and/or the circulators that are causing this port to port deviation. What should I look at in terms of the s-parameters of the transitions and/or circulators to see which ones are giving me this headache, which ones to pair together, etc. What would give me the greatest insight?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You should look at the S21. If you want to know the loss between transitions, just measure it on a network analyzer, however this could get tricky in terms of calibrating on a VNA though.
 
I understand the importance of looking at the loss. However, when I take my attenuation readings, I zero-out the insertion loss of each port every time. Therefore, I would expect that the loss in the transitions shouldn't affect my attenuation readings, even if they're all different because it just gets offset. My feeling is that maybe this has to do with s11. Anyone have any input as to how VSWR interactions would affect attenuation readings (after insertion loss is zeroed)?

Hypothetical example: I connect waveguide to waveguide, REL my power meter so it reads 0.00dB in each port.

Then I put in some sort of pad or coupler or whatever. 1 port reads 5.2dB one reads 4.8dB and another reads 4.43dB. What could cause this.
 
Last edited:
When you say you get 5.2 dB and another reads 4.8 dB, are you saying you have 2 identical pad/coupler/whatever? It could be just variations along between one device to another.

There is something call mismatch loss and it related to S11, ML = 10 \log_{10} (1-|\rho|^2).
 
Right, what I mean is if I take the same one and move it from port to port, I'll have these different readings.

I'll look into mismatch loss, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K