How do similar triangles help determine the visible area in a plane mirror?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the visible area of a wall using a small mirror and similar triangles. The problem involves a 5 cm square mirror positioned 10 cm from the eye, with the wall located 3 meters behind. The solution reveals that the height visible above the mirror is 75 cm, leading to a total visible area of 155 cm when accounting for the mirror's size. The importance of sketching the problem is emphasized as it aids in visualizing the relationships between the triangles. Ultimately, understanding similar triangles is crucial for solving geometry problems involving reflections.
Wing2015
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How much of a wall 3m behind you can be observed in a 5 cm square mirror which is held centrally at a distance of 10 cm from your eye?

Homework Equations


None that I can think of. I think this is straight geometry.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I have to use similar triangles but don't understand why. What's the rule of thumb for using similar triangles? Is it because the eye is in common between the wall and mirror? How do I know the two triangles share the same angles?

This is the answer in the book:

Let the highest part of the wall able to be seen be x metres above the top of the mirror.

From similar triangles:
X/300 =2.5\10
X=75 cm

You can see a square of the wall of length 75+5+75=155cm

Now I think I understand why the second similar triangles side length is 2.5cm ( the mirror was placed centrally hence 5cm/2) but can you explain why 75 is added twice and then to the length of the full mirror in the last part? I'm really lost.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wing2015 said:

Homework Statement


How much of a wall 3m behind you can be observed in a 5 cm square mirror which is held centrally at a distance of 10 cm from your eye?

Homework Equations


None that I can think of. I think this is straight geometry.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know I have to use similar triangles but don't understand why. What's the rule of thumb for using similar triangles? Is it because the eye is in common between the wall and mirror? How do I know the two triangles share the same angles?

This is the answer in the book:

Let the highest part of the wall able to be seen be x metres above the top of the mirror.

From similar triangles:
X/300 =2.5\10
X=75 cm

You can see a square of the wall of length 75+5+75=155cm

Now I think I understand why the second similar triangles side length is 2.5cm ( the mirror was placed centrally hence 5cm/2) but can you explain why 75 is added twice and then to the length of the full mirror in the last part? I'm really lost.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
[/B]

Because you want the total size of the square. You can see 75cm above the top of the mirror and 75cm below the bottom. Add the 5cm size of the mirror and you're done.
 
Those problems are much easier to understand if you draw a sketch.
 
Thanks for your replies! I get it now. There was a problem with the way I sketched the problem which was the reason why I wasn't able to understand.

Cheers
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top