How do solar sails defy the laws of physics?

AI Thread Summary
Solar sails operate by utilizing the momentum carried by photons, which, despite having no mass, can exert pressure when they reflect off a surface. This phenomenon is explained through the principle of conservation of momentum, where the emission of light results in a force acting in the opposite direction of the light source. The discussion highlights the potential of using lasers to enhance the propulsion of solar sails. The mechanics of solar sails can be likened to how magnets interact, pushing against each other. Overall, solar sails effectively harness light to propel spacecraft, defying traditional notions of mass and force in physics.
BlakeG.
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I briefly researched this and all i found out was that the light pushes the sail as it is reflected off of its surface.

So i am left wondering how this is possible because photons apparently have no mass therefor they can't push anything. I'm sorry if this is ignorant i am no physicist. Thanks!

and if this belongs in a different area just let me know.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Even though photons have no mass, they do carry momentum. Even in classical electromagnetism (in which photons do not appear), electromagnetic waves carry momentum and energy. All you need to explain the operation of a solar sail is conservation of momentum.
 
Thank you! sort of how magnets push each other i'd assume.
 
When a light source emits light, if the light has momentum, does this mean that there is a resultant force in the opposite direction for the light emitting object?
 
Denton said:
When a light source emits light, if the light has momentum, does this mean that there is a resultant force in the opposite direction for the light emitting object?

yes i think so because one plan to aid pushing the solar sail was to mount a laser on it to push the sail along
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top