How Do Symmetries Relate to Conservation Laws in Physics?

newphy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the connection between symmetry and conservation.

For the electromagnetic force, the conserved quantity is charge, the corresponding symmetry is the phase of the wave and the force carrier is the photon.
For the electroweak force, the conserved quantities are the weak isospin and the weak hypercharge (for the weak and em forces) and the force carriers are the W+, W- and Z0. What is the corresponding symmetry?
Same question for the strong force. The conserved quantity is the Isospin and the force carrier is the gluon. What is the symmetry corresponding to this force?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
newphy said:
I am trying to understand the connection between symmetry and conservation.

For the electromagnetic force, the conserved quantity is charge, the corresponding symmetry is the phase of the wave and the force carrier is the photon.
Which is the invariace under SO(2)=U(1) rotation.

For the electroweak force, the conserved quantities are the weak isospin and the weak hypercharge (for the weak and em forces) and the force carriers are the W+, W- and Z0. What is the corresponding symmetry?
Invariance under SU(2) \times U(1)_{ Y }.

Same question for the strong force. The conserved quantity is the Isospin and the force carrier is the gluon. What is the symmetry corresponding to this force?

Thanks

Not Iso-spin. The invariance under "rotation" in the 3-dimensional Colour space, which form the group SU(3)_{ C }, leads to 8 conserved quantities (called the colour charges) to which the 8-gluons get coupled.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top