How Do Two Rotating Rods Interact?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction of two rotating rods, specifically focusing on the conditions under which they are parallel or antiparallel. Participants explore the implications of their rotational angles and the geometry of their intersection points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the conditions for the rods being parallel or antiparallel, questioning the timing and angles involved. There are discussions about the trajectory of intersection points and the geometric relationships formed by the rods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about potential mistakes in reasoning and interpretations of the geometry involved. Some have provided insights into the nature of the intersection points and the implications of their algebraic expressions, while others are exploring the limits of the angles involved.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing discussions about the constraints imposed by the lengths of the rods and the angles of rotation, with some participants noting that certain values of time may lead to contradictions in the physical setup. The conversation also touches on the continuity of the intersection point's trajectory over time.

  • #31
Steve4Physics said:
I see it like this. A full cycle of the system occurs when rod A performs 1 full rotation and rod B performs 2 full rotations – we’re then back to the originaL start position.

Take point A as the origin so AB lies on the x-axis.

##\theta_A## is rod A’s direction (##\theta_A = \omega t##) and similarly for rod B, ##\theta_B = 2\omega t = 2\theta_A##.

There rods don' intersect for ##\pi/2 <\theta_A<3\pi/2##.

But, for example, consider ##\theta_A =7\pi/4##. Rod A bisects the 4th quadrant. Rod B points at ##7\pi/2## which is the -y direction. The intersection (point C) is (##l, -l##) so that ABC is a right-angled isosceles triangle.

Is there a mistake in my logic?
No, you are right. It wasn’t as obvious as I thought you were implying, but I didn't follow it through far enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics, scottdave and eitan77
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thank you very much to all of you, you helped me a lot!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
695
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
795
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
4K