How Do We Calculate Equivalent Resistance with Measurement Errors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantumkid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Errors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating equivalent resistance with measurement errors for resistors R1 and R2, using the formula 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2. It addresses the propagation of error, suggesting that the relationship ΔR/R² = ΔR1/R1² + ΔR2/R2² is correct for this scenario. The correct expression for ΔR incorporates partial derivatives, leading to a specific formula for the derivative with respect to R1. A recommended online resource provides further clarification on the propagation of errors. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate measurements in electrical circuits.
Quantumkid
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
we write \frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_1}+\frac{1}{R_2} where R is the equivalent resistance of R_1 and R_2.

Let there is an error in the measurements of R_1 and R_2 of \pm \Delta R_1 and
\pm\Delta R_2 respectively.
Is it correct that
\frac{\Delta R}{R^2}=\frac{\Delta R_1}{{R_1}^2}+\frac{\Delta R_2}{{R_2}^2} ?

EDIT: Corrected
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an error in the measurements of R_1 and R_2 of \Delta R_1 and \Delta R_2 respectively.
It is correct that \frac{\Delta R}{R^2}=\frac{\Delta R_1}{{R_1}^2}+\frac{\Delta R_2}{{R_2}^2}
 
Last edited:
Bump!
Nobody tried to solve it.
 
I'm a bit new to this but I believe what you want is propagation of error, which in this case would be given by:

\Delta R = \sqrt{(\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}} \Delta R_{1})^{2} + (\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{2}} \Delta R_{2})^{2}}

and the derivatives would be:
\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}} = \frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}} (R_{1}^{-1} + R_{2}^{-1})^{-2}

and similarly for R2.


The best online explanation I could find is here:
http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/PHY_LABS/AppendixB/AppendixB.html
scroll down to almost the bottom where is has the title "Propagation of Errors".
 
BTW, this
Gear.0 said:
\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}} = \frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}} (R_{1}^{-1} + R_{2}^{-1})^{-2}

reduces to

\frac{\partial R}{\partial R_{1}} = \frac{R_{2}^{2}}{(R_{1} + R_{2})^{2}}

Also, this reference
Gear.0 said:
The best online explanation I could find is here:
http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/PHY_LABS/AppendixB/AppendixB.html
scroll down to almost the bottom where is has the title "Propagation of Errors".
is really great. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top