How do we define a wave function?

andrewhei
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
what is a wave function? And how do we define a wave function? How is it related to schrodinger's equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about waves in general: water waves, light waves, sound waves, etc.? Or are you specifically asking about quantum mechanics?

And what's the background of your question? What level of physics are you studying now, how much math do you know, how far along are you in school, etc.? It's hard to answer questions when we have no idea what kind of answer is appropriate for you.
 
i am a hong kong form 7 student, 1 year from college.
i want to know about the wave funtion phi, in quantum mechanics, i only know that phi square is the probabilty density, but i don't quite understand what a wave function really is.
Also, i don't understand the derivation of the schrodiger equation.
 
It doesn't represent something measurable. It's a mathematical representation of the state of the system, and the Schrödinger equation describes how it changes with time. See #8 in this thread for a few more details. You should consider the Schrödinger equation a postulate, not a derived result. If you want to "derive" it, you're going to have to postulate something else first, e.g. what the solutions are.
 
Just to complement.. The wave function can be mathematically defined simply as the solutions of the Schrödinger's equation, which itself can't be derived. You can say the Schrödinger equation was constructed, so it describes the quantum mechanics as we observe it.

I don't think the wave functions have a direct physical interpretation. ( you have to obtain some real value from it, like it's square)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
594
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
769
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top