yayscience
- 5
- 0
Eqn. (2.1)
\frac{\partial v}{\partial z} = -L \frac{\partial i}{\partial t}
Eqn. (2.2)
\frac{\partial i}{\partial z} = -C \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}
Eqn. (2.5)
v(z,t)=V^+f(t-\frac{z}{v_p})+V^-f(t+\frac{z}{v_p})
From the book I'm reading:
"By substituting Equation (2.5) into Equations (2.1) and (2.2), we
determine that the current has the form:"
i(z,t)=\frac{V^+}{Z_0}f(t-\frac{z}{v_p})+\frac{V^-}{Z_0}f(t+\frac{z}{v_p})
So, I've seen this derivation about four different ways, and I know this is the result, but I can't see what moves I need to substitute 2.5 into 2.1 and 2.2 to get 2.5. Can someone please enlighten me? Thanks all!
\frac{\partial v}{\partial z} = -L \frac{\partial i}{\partial t}
Eqn. (2.2)
\frac{\partial i}{\partial z} = -C \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}
Eqn. (2.5)
v(z,t)=V^+f(t-\frac{z}{v_p})+V^-f(t+\frac{z}{v_p})
From the book I'm reading:
"By substituting Equation (2.5) into Equations (2.1) and (2.2), we
determine that the current has the form:"
i(z,t)=\frac{V^+}{Z_0}f(t-\frac{z}{v_p})+\frac{V^-}{Z_0}f(t+\frac{z}{v_p})
So, I've seen this derivation about four different ways, and I know this is the result, but I can't see what moves I need to substitute 2.5 into 2.1 and 2.2 to get 2.5. Can someone please enlighten me? Thanks all!