How Do You Calculate Average Velocity and Acceleration in Different Scenarios?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhxoehwhfh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating average velocity and acceleration through various scenarios involving a hockey player, a student walking to school, a car race, and a car's motion on a hill. Key calculations include determining the hockey player's average velocity over a round trip, Tina's average velocity as she walks to school, and the leading car's average speed during a race. The average acceleration of Veronica's car is calculated based on its change in velocity over time, while Jim's car's acceleration is analyzed considering direction and initial conditions. The importance of correct unit usage and clear mathematical presentation in physics problems is emphasized throughout the discussion.
rhxoehwhfh
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Q 1. A hockey player gains puck at the centre court. He then skates down the opponent’s goal and scores 2 s later. After scoring, he skates back to guard his own team’s goal post, taking 3 s to run down the court. Calculate the player’s average velocity for the entire time period. (Assume that the hockey court is 5.0 x 101 m long). [3 Marks]

Q 2. Tina walks to her school in 10 min. The displacement for that walk is 250 m [N360E]. What was her average velocity? [2 Marks]

Q 3. Vic was watching a car race on TV. At the instant the flag was lowered to start the race, the picture on TV screen goes out due to surge in the power. When the picture come back on TV, the timer on score board reads 75 s. At this point Vic observes that leading car was on opposite side of the racing track (opposite side to that racing was started). The racing track is oval in shape and 6 Km in length. [6 Marks]
a) Determine leading cars average velocity during the time when TV was without picture? ☺☺
b) What are two possible distances leading car traveled when TV was without picture? ☺
c) Given the record for fastest racing car is 450 Km/hr, which is most likely distance-leading car has traveled when TV was without picture? ☺☺
d) Based on your calculation in (c), calculate leading car average speed when TV was without picture? ☺

Q 4. Veronica’s car velocity increases from +5.0 m/s to +40 m/s in 5 s time interval. What is her average acceleration? [2 marks]

Q5. Jim has a standard gearbox car. One day he parked his car on a hill and went to shopping. After shopping when he started his car, it stalled and started to roll backward down the hill. At this instant time car had the velocity of 4.0 m/s down the hill. Fortunately Jim was able to start his car so car started accelerating back up (up the hill). After accelerating for 3.0 s, the car was traveling uphill at 3.5 m/s. Calculate the car’s acceleration once Jim got it started. (Assume that the car’s acceleration was constant).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my answer for my problem, can anyone correct me'"?

1. V= 1/2(V+v) -> 12.5m/s & 16.6m/s -> 14.55 m/s (Average Velocity)
2. 250/ 10*60 = 0.4166m/s or 25m/m
3. a) 6000/2 -> 3000/75 -> 40m/s
b) 3km, 3000m
c) 40m/s -> 144km/hr < 450km/hr; Therefore 450km/hr car is most likely distance-leading car.
d) 40* 60* 60m/hr -> 144000m/hr -> 144km/hr

4. 40-5/5 = 35/5 -> 7m/s

5. a= V-v/t -> a= 3.5-4/3 -> acceleration is -0.166
 
Last edited:
rhxoehwhfh said:
Here is my answer for my problem, can anyone correct me'"?

1. V= 1/2(V+v) -> 12.5m/s & 16.6m/s -> 14.55 m/s (Average Velocity)

Average velocity is defined as net displacement divided by the time interval. It is average speed that is given by total distance covered divided by the time interval.

In either case, your calculation would not be correct. (For one thing, you don't generally get the average velocity by averaging two different average velocities taken over different intervals.) For this question, recall that the skater started at center court and ended up back at his own goal.

2. 250/ 10*60 = 0.4166m/s or 25m/min

This one is fine.

3. a) 6000 m/2 -> 3000 m
3000 m/75 sec -> 40m/s

I broke this into two statements. Be careful about merging all your calculations into one giant statement: it is not only incorrect mathematically, but it needlessly confuses readers, certain of whom will be grading your assignments and exams...

Otherwise, this answer is OK.

b) 3km = 3000m

This is one possible distance the lead car could have traveled. Is there any other distance it could have covered on the oval track that would put it on the far end when the TV viewer was able to watch it again?

c) 40m/s -> 144km/hr < 450km/hr; Therefore 450km/hr car is most likely distance-leading car.

How fast is 450 km/hr in meters per second? How far could a race car moving that fast travel in 75 seconds?

d) 40* 60* 60m/hr -> 144000m/hr -> 144km/hr

This is connected with part (c). Given that the leading car is seen at the far side of the track and that is has traveled the most likely distance in 75 seconds for a near record holding car, what average speed would it have? (Remember the definition of average speed.)

4. 40-5/5 = 35/5 -> 7m/s

Be careful about your units. The average acceleration is

[ (final velocity) - (initial velocity) ]/ time interval , so this gives

[ (+40 m/sec) - (+5 m/sec) ] / 5 sec = (+35 m/sec)/5 sec = +7 m/(sec^2) ,

which are the proper units for acceleration. Your answer is otherwise correct.

5. a= V-v/t -> a= 3.5-4/3 -> acceleration is -0.166

This question illustrates why I made a point of adding the signs of the velocities in the last answer. How have you account for the directions of the car's velocity? Also remember that you want to subtract the initial velocity from the final velocity. (And don't forget to include the units!)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top