How Do You Calculate Forces on a Crate on an Inclined Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikstykal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the forces on a crate on an inclined plane, a free body diagram (FBD) is essential for visualizing the forces acting on the crate. The normal force can be derived using the equations of motion, resulting in N = Fsinθ + mgcosθ when the acceleration in the y-direction is zero. The acceleration in the x-direction can be expressed as ax = -μ(Fsinθ + mgcosθ) + Fcosθ - mgsinθ, simplifying the analysis of motion along the incline. There is a discussion about the orientation of the FBD, with some suggesting that aligning it with the physical arrangement could simplify calculations. Overall, the calculations and reasoning presented appear to be correct, emphasizing the importance of proper diagram orientation in physics problems.
Nikstykal
Messages
29
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Crate of mass m is pushed horizontally with force F up an inclined plane of θ from ground. The plane has a friction coefficient of μ.

a) draw free body diagram of crate
b) derive expression for normal force
c) derive expression for acceleration

*** Use ONLY m, g, F, μ, θ ****

Homework Equations


ΣF = ma
|a| = √(ax2+ay2)

The Attempt at a Solution


w8KETdD.png
[/B]
Included is a picture of the problem with my free body diagram.

I set the normal as the y-axis so that when solving ΣFy=may I can set ay=0.

ΣFx=max=-μN+Fcosθ-mgsinθ
ΣFy=may=N-Fsinθ-mgcosθ

ay=0 so N = Fsinθ+mgcosθ (part b)

Since ay=0, a=√ax2 = ax. Substituting N into ax:
max=-μ(Fsinθ+mgcosθ)+Fcosθ-mgsinθ

is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks correct.
 
Looks correct to me as well although I would have drawn the fbd at the same angle. Nothing wrong with yours it just look odd.
 
CWatters said:
Looks correct to me as well although I would have drawn the fbd at the same angle. Nothing wrong with yours it just look odd.
If you do that then you will have two components of acceleration (in the x AND y direction) and so your definition of N would involve more variables than the ones they allow, or at least would involve a lot more manipulation to isolate N.
 
Nikstykal said:
If you do that then you will have two components of acceleration (in the x AND y direction) and so your definition of N would involve more variables than the ones they allow, or at least would involve a lot more manipulation to isolate N.
mfb was only commenting on the orientation of the FBD. You can draw it with the same orientation as the physical arrangement but still choose the X and Y axes as parallel and normal to the plane.
 
Oh... my bad
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top