How Do You Calculate Initial Velocity in Complex Projectile Motion Setups?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial velocity of a marble launched from a two-part ramp, consider the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy, assuming negligible losses from friction and air resistance. The initial velocity will indeed have two components due to the ramp's angles. The change in height should be measured from the top of the ramp to the point where the marble leaves it. Use trigonometry to determine the horizontal component by multiplying the total velocity by the cosine of the launch angle. Understanding these principles will help accurately calculate the initial velocity in complex projectile motion setups.
lost_cause
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody! My name is Nazia, and I’m from Australia . This is my first post, so please let me know if I do something wrong.

I’m 15 and in grade 11. I seem to be having problems with Projectile motion.

Recently, we were required to conduct an experiment, in which a marble was launched off a ramp. The ramp was a had two parts, one an incline was connected to horizontal tube, which was connected the to a tube that was elevated by 45 degrees of the bench.

The ramp kind of looks like this:
\
\_/

( the left side lines are meant to be connected, to from one straight line)


I’m having trouble calculating the initial velocity it leaves the ramp with. I’ve done only problems where the initial velocity was horizontal. However in this problem the initial velocity will have two components right?

Does anyone have any suggestions how I work out the intial velocity??

Thanks

Has it got something to do with, a loss in Potential energy equals a gain in Kinetic??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are assuming that the losses to friction, air resistance, etc., are negligable, then the loss in potential energy will equal the gain in kinetic energy, like you suggested, and this should solve the problem. Keep in mind that the change in height is not the change from the highest point to the lowest point, but from the top of the ramp to the height at which it leaves the ramp. The velocity will have two components. Solving the kinetic energy equation will give the speed of the ball. If this is what you want, you can stop here. If you want the horizontal component, multiply by the cosine of the angle between the horizontal and the velocity of the ball.
 
You will, of course, need to use a little trigonometry to find the difference in heights between the initial and final points. You say that the last incline is at 45 degrees. You will also need to know the slope of the first incline and the lengths of the two inclines. As long as you are ignoring friction, the length of the horizontal middle section is irrelevant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top