How Do You Calculate Original Velocity from Momentum in a Two-Spacecraft System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peanut15
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the original velocity of two linked spacecraft after they are thrust apart, the momentum of each spacecraft must be determined using P=mv, with velocities resolved into component vectors. The total momentum is calculated by adding the x-components of each spacecraft's momentum, ensuring that the original total momentum is conserved. The total mass of the linked spacecraft is also considered for accurate calculations. While converting velocities from km/h to m/s is common practice, it may not be necessary if the final answer is acceptable in km/h. The steps taken in the calculation appear correct, focusing on momentum conservation principles.
peanut15
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
spacecraft that are linked together are then thrust apart by large springs,

S1 has a mass of 1.9x10^4 kg, then has a velocity of 3.5x10^3km/h at 5.1 degrees to the original direction..

S2 has a mass of 1.7x10^4kg and a velocity of 3.4x10^3km/h at 5.9 degrees to the original direction.


I just want to double check to make sure I solved this correctly.


3. I converted km/h into m/s. Then I calculated each spaceships momentum using P=mv and resolved each spaceship into its own component vector.

I figured the X in each component vector would add up to the original total momentum of the 2 spaceships when they were linked together, because Pt = P1+P2

I solved each x compenent using X=Pcos(theta) then I added them together to get the total momentum.

I also added the mass of the two spaceships together to get the total mass when they were linked together.

Using both of these values I used P=mv to calculate the original velocity of the two spaceships when they were linked together.

I'm not worried about any math errors, just the errors in any steps that I took. Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good!

By the way, it's probably not necessary to convert the velocities into m/s. Since they were giving you km/h velocities, that more or less implies that an answer in km/h is acceptable.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top