How Do You Calculate Short Circuit Current in Thevenin Equivalent Circuits?

Click For Summary
To calculate the short circuit current in Thevenin equivalent circuits, one must first determine the open circuit voltage (VAB), which is found using voltage division. The confusion arises when trying to find the short circuit current (IAB) by replacing the load resistor (RL) with a wire; this leads to the misconception that no current flows through R3. The correct approach involves finding the equivalent resistance by shorting the voltage source, which results in R3 being in parallel with R1 and R2. Ultimately, the Thevenin resistance (RTH) can be calculated as RTH = VAB/IAB, confirming the relationship between Thevenin and Norton equivalents. Understanding these concepts clarifies the process of finding Thevenin equivalents in circuit analysis.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I need to find the Thevenin equivalent of the circuit shown:

I found the open circuit voltage (VAB) by noting that VAB = V3 and used the voltage division

V_{AB} = V_s\left ( \frac{R_3}{R_1||R_2 + R_3}\right ) = 12\V

I am having a little trouble finding the short circuit current IAB (which comes about by replacing RL with a wire).
thev.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



We can see that the current that comes out of the combined resistance of R1||R2 is what goes into R3 and the length of wire AB. Now it was my reasoning that since the wire AB offers no resistance, then there is no incentive for current to flow through R3 and hence the current through AB would just be:

I_{AB}=\frac{V_s}{R_1||R_2}

but this does not give the correct results.

Any thoughts on this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the short circuit current -- that would be for the Norton equivalent. What you want is the equivalent resistance at AB with the voltage source shorted. Easy-peasy.
 
So this is just the equivalent resistance of the circuit, but not including RL right?

I.e.

R_{TH} = (R_1||R_2) + R_3

?
 
Last edited:
I don't know what R6 is. But assuming you meant R2,... No. If Vs is shorted then R3 ends up in parallel with R1 and R2.
 
gneill said:
I don't know what R6 is. But assuming you meant R2,... No. If Vs is shorted then R3 ends up in parallel with R1 and R2.

Yes R2 (edited for clarity).

I guess I don't know the method you are using. It never crossed my mind to short Vs. The method I was shown was 1) Find Voc, 2) Find Isc and then obtain RTH = Voc/Isc.

I know that you are probably using a shorter method, but with a test in the morning, I'll keep going the slow and steady way. It turns out my method in post #1 works, I'm just an idiot and can't do basic division :redface: . VAB/IAB =RTH and my result checks out (3 kΩ IIRC).

As a matter of curiosity: If you "short" Vs, where does the current come from? I don't think there is any :confused: and hence i have trouble seeing what is in parallel with what.
 
Saladsamurai said:
Yes R2 (edited for clarity).
As a matter of curiosity: If you "short" Vs, where does the current come from? I don't think there is any :confused: and hence i have trouble seeing what is in parallel with what.

If you short Vs, there's no current. Just a resistive network. The resitance "seen" at AB is the Thevenin resistance.

In general, you find the Thevenin equivalent by (1) determining the open circuit voltage and (2) determining the equivalent resistance of the network that remains after shorting out all voltage supplies and opening all current supplies.

You find the Norton equivalent in a similar way. (1) determine the short circuit current, and (2) determine the equivalent resistance when all current supplies have been opened and all voltage supplies shorted.

As you can see, the Norton resistance is exactly the same as the Thevenin resistance (which makes interconverting the two quite a simple matter). And it also explains why finding the short circuit current is another path to finding the Thevenin resistance.
 
Well I'll be dipped! Thanks again gneill :smile: I think I see it now! Though "parallel" is defined to mean a shared voltage ... so it doesn't make 100% sense since there is no voltage ... but I kind of get it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K