How Do You Calculate the Actual Diameter of a Red Blood Cell Using a Microscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter katierob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Microscope
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the actual diameter of a red blood cell using a microscope, the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece lenses, along with the barrel length and the angle subtended by the image, are essential. The magnification formula m = -L/Fo(25cm/Fe) is used, but the user struggles with deriving the object height without knowing the image height. The angle subtended at the eye can help determine the image height, as it relates to the ratio of height to distance. Despite attempts to apply the formulas, the calculations yield incorrect results, particularly in the final object height. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and understanding the relationships between the variables involved.
katierob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A microscope has an objective lens with a focal length of 16.22 mm and an eyepiece with a focal length of 9.30 mm. With the length of the barrel set at 25.0 cm, the diameter of a red blood cell's image subtends an angle of 1.43 mrad with the eye. If the final image distance is 25.0 cm from the eyepiece, what is the actual diameter of the red blood cell?
h1 =

Homework Equations


m=-L/Fo(25cm/Fe)
m=hi/ho

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't figure out how to get the object height without the image height? I think it has something to do with the angle at which the image subtends with the eye, but I don't have an equation for that, so I don't know where to go once I get m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For small angles, the angle is the ratio of the height of the image to its distance from the eye. This comes from the definition of an angle (in radians) as the ratio of arc length to radius. If you know how far the image is from the eye, you can calculate its height from the angle.
 
thanks, so I tried this again using the ratio you gave above, but it still isn't coming out right, here's what I did:
m=-(25/1.622)(25/.93)=-414.3298463
height of the image=(1.43e-3)(25cm)=.03575
height of the object=(.03575) / (-414.3298463) = -.86283912e-6 meters
why is this incorrect?
 
katierob said:
thanks, so I tried this again using the ratio you gave above, but it still isn't coming out right, here's what I did:
m=-(25/1.622)(25/.93)=-414.3298463
height of the image=(1.43e-3)(25cm)=.03575
height of the object=(.03575) / (-414.3298463) = -.86283912e-6 meters
why is this incorrect?

check your e-6
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top