How Do You Calculate the Average Force on a Driver in a Crash?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayberd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Wall
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average force on a driver during a crash, one must consider the total work done on the driver, which is equal to the change in kinetic energy as the driver decelerates from 90 km/h to rest. The average force can be determined by equating this work to the product of the average force and the stopping distance. The safety harness applies a varying force over the distance, but the average force can still be calculated without knowing the exact variation. Reasonable estimates for the mass of the driver and stopping distance are around 75 kg and 1 meter, respectively. This approach provides a practical method to estimate the average force experienced by the driver during the crash.
jayberd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem:
A race car skidding out of control manages to slow down to 90km/h before crashing head-on into a brick wall. Fortunately, the driver is wearing a safety harness. Using reasonable values for the mass of the driver and the stopping distance, estimate the average force exerted on the driver by the safety harness, including its direction. Neglect any effects of frictional forces on the driver by the seat.

Equations:
F=ma this is net force, but what is average force?
vx=vox+axt


I tried using the vx equation to find the acceleration. I guessed the initial velocity of the car/driver was 130km/h and I also guessed it would take 5 seconds to bring the velocity down to 90km/h. I ended up getting a really tiny force no matter how I tried it. I also just tried finding the acceleration the normal way, but the same thing. Anyone else have a good way of going about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF jayberd!

The idea with the average force is that the safety harness applies a force to the driver over some distance (i.e. it allows him to move forward somewhat before stopping). In general, that force might vary over that distance in a complicated way (it won't be constant). We don't have enough information to say how the force that the safety harness applies varies with position during this stopping motion. All we can speak of is some sort of average force, where the average is taken over the distance interval.

The good news is that the total work done on the driver (which we DO know because we know his initial and final kinetic energies) will still be equal to that distance-averaged force times the total distance. So you don't have to actually take the average (which is good, because again, you don't have enough information to do so). Based on the total work done, you can work out what the average force had to have been.

We're talking about the deceleration that occurs from the moment of hitting the wall to the moment of the driver coming to a full stop. So 90 km/h is the INITIAL condition here, not the final one. The final condition is that the driver is at rest.
 
Last edited:
cepheid said:
Welcome to PF jayberd!

The idea with the average force is that the safety harness applies a force to the driver over some distance (i.e. it allows him to move forward somewhat before stopping). In general, that force might vary over that distance in a complicated way (it won't be constant). We don't have enough information to say how the force that the safety harness applies varies with position during this stopping motion. All we can speak of is some sort of average force, where the average is taken over the distance interval.

The good news is that the total work done on the driver (which we DO know because we know his initial and final kinetic energies) will still be equal to that distance-averaged force times the total distance. So you don't have to actually take the average (which is good, because again, you don't have enough information to do so). Based on the total work done, you can work out what the average force had to have been.

We're talking about the deceleration that occurs from the moment of hitting the wall to the moment of the driver coming to a full stop. So 90 km/h is the INITIAL condition here, not the final one. The final condition is that the driver is at rest.

so I end up having to solve for
0km/hr=90km/hr+axt
but where does t come from? s=dt? or can I use displacement in terms of velocity?
 
jayberd said:
so I end up having to solve for
0km/hr=90km/hr+axt
but where does t come from? s=dt? or can I use displacement in terms of velocity?

Umm, did you read my post? I think the best way of solving this problem is just to compute the total work done on the driver and equate it to the (average force)*(distance).
 
Last edited:
Or you could use the kinematic formula for velocity in terms of displacement, the only difference from usual being that a is interpreted as being the average acceleration (with the average being as I described before).
 
I suspect they're asking for the force exerted on the driver as he slows from 90km/h to 0km/h as the car crashes into the wall, crumpling up the front end of the car.

"... Using reasonable values for the mass of the driver and the stopping distance, estimate the average force exerted on the driver by the safety harness ..."

Reasonable mass & stopping distance might be ~75kg and ~1m respectively, both ± 30% or so.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top