How Do You Calculate the Axis Distances for Zero Torque in a Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ladolce
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distances a and b for zero torque in a square setup with two forces applied at opposite corners. Participants note that the angles between the force vectors and the lines connecting the axis to the points of application complicate the problem, making it challenging to achieve a unique solution for a and b. It is suggested to focus on the diagonal of the square to simplify calculations, as this approach allows for easier angle management. The relationship between a and b is established, with b being six times a in one setup, while another equation links the two distances based on the forces' action lines. The problem is acknowledged as complex, lacking definitive numerical values for a straightforward solution.
ladolce
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rotational axis is directed perpendicular to the plane of a square and is located as shown in the drawing. Two forces, 1 and 2, are applied to diagonally opposite corners, and act along the sides of the square, first as shown in part a and then as shown in part b of the drawing. In each case the net torque produced by the forces is zero. The square is one meter on a side, and the magnitude of 2 is 6 times that of 1. Find the distances a and b that locate the axis. Note that a and b are not drawn to scale.
a = ? m
b = ? m

THE PICTURE :
p9-10.gif


Homework Equations



sum of net torque=Fl

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I got this help, but i don't think it's right...anyone else able to check this to see where it's wrong?

http://answerboard.cramster.com/Answer-Board/Image/20077162019426332021398232387507779.jpg
 

Attachments

  • p9-10.gif
    p9-10.gif
    13.2 KB · Views: 621
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right and the solution is wrong. The theta's in the problem are the angles between the force vector and the vector connecting the axis to the point where the force is applied. It's going to be tough to make them all 90 degrees. On the other hand the question is pretty nasty. There is not a unique solution for a or b! I don't know quite what the person who framed this question was thinking of. I would suggest you just try and find one point by confining your search to the diagonal of the square connecting the two forces. That makes the problem at least manageble and the angles are easy.
 
Dick said:
You are right and the solution is wrong. The theta's in the problem are the angles between the force vector and the vector connecting the axis to the point where the force is applied. It's going to be tough to make them all 90 degrees. On the other hand the question is pretty nasty. There is not a unique solution for a or b! I don't know quite what the person who framed this question was thinking of. I would suggest you just try and find one point by confining your search to the diagonal of the square connecting the two forces. That makes the problem at least manageble and the angles are easy.


I agree, I'm finding it impossible to find a and b! I wanted to use the diagonal also, but I only know the large diagonal is the sq.root of 2 and it has a correlation to the sq.root of a squared + b squared...there arent any numbers to use though!
 
If you are along the diagonal then a=b (at least in the second picture). Compute the distance to the points where the force is applied. sin(theta) for both forces will be the same - just opposite in sign, right?
 
Last edited:
From the first setup one gets that

b = 6a

From the second setup one gets that

\frac{6}{1} = \frac{1 - a}{b}

since the action line of the resultant needs to go through the pivot point in order to produce a zero torque.
 

Attachments

  • torque problem.gif
    torque problem.gif
    8.2 KB · Views: 920
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top