How Do You Calculate the Fraction of Ethylene in a Copolymer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ][nstigator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions Weight
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the fraction of ethylene in a copolymer consisting of 62 wt% ethylene and 38 wt% propylene, the weight of each component is first determined by multiplying their molecular weights by their respective percentages. The calculations yield 17.39 for ethylene and 15.98 for propylene. The fraction of ethylene is then found by dividing the weight of ethylene by the total weight of both components, resulting in a formula of 17.39 divided by the sum of 15.98 and 17.39. This approach is correct for determining the fraction of ethylene mer in the copolymer. The final answer should be expressed to three decimal points.
][nstigator
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Heres a question I am stuck with

Crosslinked polymers consisting of 62 wt% ethylene and 38 wt% propylene may have elastic properties similar those for natural rubber. For a copolymer of this composition, determine the fraction of the ethylene mer.

Express your answer with three decimal points.



I honestly am lost with how to do this question...

What I did was...

Found the weight of ethylene (28.052) and the weight of propylene (42.078)...then multipled by the percentages and got...

28.052*0.62 = 17.39
42.078*0.38 = 15.98

then..

fraction = 17.39/(15.98+17.39)

I doubt this is right...any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry I think I posted this in the wrong section.

My apologies
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top