How Do You Calculate the Initial Height of a Ski Jump?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juggalomike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Physics
Click For Summary
To calculate the initial height of a ski jump, the skier's mass and the height from which they jump are essential. The discussion emphasizes using energy conservation principles and kinematics to find the correct height. The skier's horizontal velocity is determined by dividing the horizontal distance by the time taken to fall, which is calculated using the vertical drop. The final calculations suggest that the initial height, H, is approximately 10.82 meters, although there is some uncertainty regarding the velocity values used. The method involves applying kinematic equations to eliminate time and isolate the variable H for accurate results.
juggalomike
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A skier (m=53.00 kg) starts sliding down from the top of a ski jump with negligible friction and takes off horizontally. If h = 8.00 m and D = 9.50 m, find H.
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/616/prob21a.gif


Homework Equations


.5mv^2+mgh=.5mv^2+mgh


The Attempt at a Solution


I first divided to vertical distance by 9.81 to get .81seconds, then 9.50/.81 to get the horizontal velocity, which is 11.72 m/s

I then plugged the information into the above equation for

53*9.81*x=.5*53*11.72^2+53*9.81*8
solving for x i got 15.01 m, which is not correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I think you need to consider the velocity of the skier when he leaves the ramp. mgH-mgh is the kinetic energy at that point, right? And if there is no drag, then the horizontal velocity at the time he leaves the ramp will be constant throughout the drop.

Then you can use kinematics to solve for that x velocity, right? Use a system of kinematics equations(I think this is what you are missing) to get rid of time and I believe there is only one variable left: H

EDIT: I get 10.82m for the answer. If that isn't correct, then the way I suggested might not be right.
 
Last edited:
Brilliant said:
Well, I think you need to consider the velocity of the skier when he leaves the ramp. mgH-mgh is the kinetic energy at that point, right? And if there is no drag, then the horizontal velocity at the time he leaves the ramp will be constant throughout the drop.

Then you can use kinematics to solve for that x velocity, right? Use a system of kinematics equations(I think this is what you are missing) to get rid of time and I believe there is only one variable left: H

EDIT: I get 10.82m for the answer. If that isn't correct, then the way I suggested might not be right.
your answer was correct, thanks for the help but could you please tell me how you used kinematics to solve for velocity? after plugging the hight u gave me back into the energy equation i see the velocity was 7.44, which is way off from what i was getting.
 
Yeah, of course.
So in the x direction, I used the equation:
<br /> \Delta x = v_{x}t+\frac {1}{2}at^2<br />
So in terms of this problem:
<br /> D= v_{x}t<br />
Because there is no acceleration.

In the y direction, I used the same equation, and in terms of this problem:
<br /> h= \frac {1}{2}at^2<br />
I left off the vt because there is no initial y velocity since the skier leaves the ramp horizontally.

I solved this for t and substituted it into the first equation, and then solved it for vx

I think you can finish it once you have this velocity.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K