How Do You Calculate the Mass at the Impaction Point of a Swinging Hammer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iliepins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass at the impaction point of a swinging hammer, consider both the hammer head (mass M1) and the handle (mass M2). The kinetic energy can be calculated using E=1/2mv^2, where velocity (v) is known, or by using the moment of inertia (I) for rotational motion with E=1/2 * I * w^2. The moment of inertia can be approximated by treating the hammer as two parts: the head as a point mass and the handle as a rod, leading to I = I_h + I_r. For a more accurate calculation, consider the distribution of mass and the angular velocity at the point of impact.
iliepins
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Looking for quidance on calculating the mass at an impaction point of a swinging hammer. The hammer is set up to be swung pneumatically just at the edge of the handle in the horizontal plane. I understand the calculation E=1/2mv^2. Velocity is being measure just before the impaction point. So I'm happy with that and know the value. Let say v=5m/s. The question is on mass. the hammer head has a mass M1 and the handle has a mass M2. What is the mass to be used at the impaction point. M2, M2+M1, center of mass (but then how do i figure that), some other method? I want to simply calculate the energy being imparted at that point.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since it is a rotational motion, I'd instead find the moment of inertia I of the hammer about the axis of rotation at the end of the handle, and then use the formula for the kinetic energy of the rotational motion at angular velocity w:

E = 1/2 * I * w^2

As an approximation, consider the hammer as consisting of two parts. Approximate the metal head with mass M1 at radius r=R1, and e.g. a rod of some mass M2 going from r=0 to r=R1 (assuming homogeneous mass distribution along its length).

The moment of inertial about r=0 of the head in this approximation is I_h = M1*R1^2 since we are approximating it as a point.

The moment of inertial about r=0 of a radial rod of mass M2 of length R1 is (from looking it up on wikipedia) I_r = 1/3 * M2 * R1^2 (please double-check this...)

Thus, the moment of inertial about r=0 of the entire hammer in this approx is I = I_h + I_r.

Then the kinetic energy if the hammer is E = 1/2 * I * w^2 where w is the angular velocity (in radians per second) of the rotational motion upon impact.

It is of course possible to find a more accurate moment of inertia of the hammer by not assuming the head to be located at one point.

Of course, if the head is much more massive than the handle, then your can just approximate everything by incoming linear motion of the head at v=5m/s.
 
welcome to pf!

hi iliepins! welcome to pf! :smile:
iliepins said:
Looking for quidance on calculating the mass at an impaction point of a swinging hammer. The hammer is set up to be swung pneumatically just at the edge of the handle in the horizontal plane. I understand the calculation E=1/2mv^2.

why do you want the energy?

the effect is measured by the momentum of the hammer, p = mv (or by the angular momentum, Iω, if the hammer is too extensive) :wink:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top