How Do You Calculate the Variable Resistance for Optimal Battery Charging?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the variable resistance R for optimal battery charging, the goal is to ensure 25 Watts is absorbed by the battery with a 10.5V element. The current through the battery is determined to be approximately 2.381 A. Using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL), the equation -13 + 0.02*i + iR + 0.035*i + 10.5 = 0 is established. The resistance R can be calculated by substituting the current value into the equation derived from KVL. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly factoring in the 0.035 ohm resistor in the calculations to achieve the desired power dissipation.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/bf073a5eb1.png
http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/bf073a5eb1.png

Determine the variable resistance R if the 25 Watts to be absorbed by the battery (0.035 ohm resistor and the 10.5 V element).

Homework Equations


V = IR
P = IV

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I did KVL clockwise current flow
-13 + 0.02*i + iR + 0.035*i + 10.5 = 0
2.5 = 0.02i + 0.035i + iR

Then factoring in 25W=10.5*i
i = 2.381 A which is close to the answer but doesn't factor in 0.035 and I'm not sure how to do it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jesuslovesu said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I did KVL clockwise current flow
-13 + 0.02*i + iR + 0.035*i + 10.5 = 0
2.5 = 0.02i + 0.035i + iR

Then factoring in 25W=10.5*i
i = 2.381 A which is close to the answer but doesn't factor in 0.035 and I'm not sure how to do it

The question was to compute R such that you got 25 W dissipated in the 10.5V battery. You computed what the current through this battery must be. Now use that in the equation with i and R you wrote above
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top