How Do You Calculate the Width of a Slit in a Diffraction Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuBbLeS01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slit Width
Click For Summary
To calculate the width of a slit in a diffraction experiment, the setup involves a helium-neon laser illuminating a single slit, with the diffraction pattern observed on a screen 1.7 m away. The distance between the first and second minima is given as 6.78 mm, which is crucial for determining the slit width. The correct approach involves using the relationship between the minima and the slit width, requiring a clear understanding of the positions of the minima. A diagram can aid in visualizing the setup and ensuring the correct distances are used in calculations. Ultimately, the width of the slit can be derived from the difference in positions of the minima.
BuBbLeS01
Messages
602
Reaction score
0
Width of Slit...HeLP on setup Please!

Homework Statement


A helium-neon laser (λ=590 nm) illuminates a single slit and is observed on a screen 1.7 m behind the slit. The distance between the first and second minima in the diffraction pattern is 6.78 mm. What is the width (in mm) of the slit?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think I am supposed to use the equation...

W = 2tL/a
t = wavelength
t = 0.00000059 m
L = 1.7 m
a = .00678 m

but that gets me 0.2956 mm
If I divide that by 2 I get the right answer so I am a little confused on my setup
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The distance 6.78 mm is the difference between the m=2 and m=1 minima. It is not the distance from the centre of the screen to the second minima (if that's what you are doing). Draw a diagram. You need to find one expression for the distance for m=1 minimum and one for the m=2 minimum. You know the difference between these two is 6.78 mm. This will allow you to solve for the slit width.
 
The width of the slit is going from m=1 on 1 side of the central maxima to m=1 on the other side right? And fringe spacing between all fringes is equal correct?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K