How Do You Derive the Lagrangian from a Given Hamiltonian?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Lagrangian from a given Hamiltonian, specifically with the Hamiltonian expressed as H = p_1p_2 + q_1q_2. Participants are exploring the relationship between generalized coordinates and canonical momenta in the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the Lagrangian using the relationship L = \dot{q}_ip_i - H, but expresses uncertainty about the complexity of the resulting partial differential equation. Some participants question whether fundamental aspects have been overlooked in the derivation process.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen some participants indicating they have resolved their issues, while others continue to explore the general formulation of the Hamiltonian and its implications for deriving the Lagrangian. There is a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and share insights without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes constraints related to the general form of the Hamiltonian and its dependence on the number of dimensions and constraints, which may influence the derivation process. Additionally, there are mentions of issues with marking the thread as solved, indicating potential procedural constraints within the forum.

malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,436

Homework Statement



[tex]H = p_1p_2 + q_1q_2[/tex]

Find the corresponding Lagrangian, [itex]q_i[/itex] are generelized coordinates and
[itex]p_i[/itex] are canonical momenta.

Homework Equations



[tex]H = \dot{q}_ip_i - L[/tex]

[tex]p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}[/tex]

[tex]\dot{q}_i = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Using these relations, I found:


[tex]L = \dot{q}_ip_i - H[/tex]

[tex]L = p_1p_2 + p_2p_1 - p_1p_2 + q_1q_2 = p_1p_2 - q_1q_2 =[/tex]

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_1}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_2}-q_1q_2[/tex]

Am I supposed to solve this nasty PDE? Or have I forgot something really fundamental?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I had missed something fundamental, its solved now
 
Hi,

it is only a bagatelle, but if you write the Hamilton function in generel, not for a concret case, then you schould write it like that:

[tex]\mathcal{H}(q_{1} \ldots q_{s}, p_{1} \ldots p_{s}, t) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{s} p_{i} \dot{q}_{i} - \mathcal{L}(q_{1} \ldots q_{s}, \dot{q}_{1} \ldots \dot{q}_{s},t)[/tex]

[tex]& s = 3N-m \text{ with N dimensions and m constraints}[/tex]

all the best
 
I know, I already listed that eq. under "relevant eq's".

Aslo I have solved the problem, no need to post.

Also, it seems I can't marked this thread as solved in the "old way", why is that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K