emily081715
- 208
- 4
by using what i did earlier i get the mass of cart A as 2.1 kgberkeman said:Looks good so far!![]()
The discussion focuses on determining the inertia of cart A after a collision with a 1-kg standard cart. The primary equations referenced include the law of inertia, F=ma, and the conservation of momentum (P=mv). Participants clarify that inertia in this context refers to mass, and they emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between forces and momentum changes during the collision. The final calculated inertia of cart A is approximately 2.1 kg, although there is a suggestion that it could be 2.5 kg based on visual inspection of the graph provided.
PREREQUISITESStudents studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators looking for examples of collision problems and their solutions.
by using what i did earlier i get the mass of cart A as 2.1 kgberkeman said:Looks good so far!![]()
Almost there...emily081715 said:p=mv
pi=pf
m1v+m2v=m1v+ m2v
1(0)+m2(4)=m1(4.2)+m2(2)
-4.2 =m2(2-4)
I don't think you missed anything, and based on a visual inspection of the graph, that looks to be the correct answer. Why can I tell that with a visual inspection?emily081715 said:what step have i missed? solving the rest of the equation i get an answer of 2.1 kg
the answer should've been 2.50berkeman said:I don't think you missed anything, and based on a visual inspection of the graph, that looks to be the correct answer. Why can I tell that with a visual inspection?
Interesting. I could see maybe 2.2 if the estimate of v=4.2 should be v=4.4 instead, but to get all the way up to 2.5m/s would take something else.emily081715 said:the answer should've been 2.50
The problem apparently is that she re-posted this question after she did not get enough hand-holding in her first thread attempt, and I took the bait. The problem turned out to be more complicated than I expected when I first replied, which is fine, but it would have been good if I hadn't wasted so much time assuming it was a simple question when the OP knew already that it was not.I like Serena said:Hi Simon Bridge,
I don't get what you mean.
Just from Emily's previous posts in this thread she seems the have a firm grasp on the total momentum, and on setting up equations and solving them.
The one thing missing is the loss due to friction - for which she did not get a clear response.
And her request to break it down went unanswered.