emily081715
- 208
- 4
by using what i did earlier i get the mass of cart A as 2.1 kgberkeman said:Looks good so far!![]()
by using what i did earlier i get the mass of cart A as 2.1 kgberkeman said:Looks good so far!![]()
the answer should've been 2.50berkeman said:I don't think you missed anything, and based on a visual inspection of the graph, that looks to be the correct answer. Why can I tell that with a visual inspection?
Interesting. I could see maybe 2.2 if the estimate of v=4.2 should be v=4.4 instead, but to get all the way up to 2.5m/s would take something else.emily081715 said:the answer should've been 2.50
The problem apparently is that she re-posted this question after she did not get enough hand-holding in her first thread attempt, and I took the bait. The problem turned out to be more complicated than I expected when I first replied, which is fine, but it would have been good if I hadn't wasted so much time assuming it was a simple question when the OP knew already that it was not.I like Serena said:Hi Simon Bridge,
I don't get what you mean.
Just from Emily's previous posts in this thread she seems the have a firm grasp on the total momentum, and on setting up equations and solving them.
The one thing missing is the loss due to friction - for which she did not get a clear response.
And her request to break it down went unanswered.