How Do You Find the PDF of Z and Calculate Mean and Variance Using MGF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter silkdigital
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joint Pdf
AI Thread Summary
To find the PDF of Z = X + Y, one approach is to use a transformation method, letting u = x + y, and then applying the transformation theorem to relate the joint PDF to the new variable. The joint PDF given is f(x,y) = 2(x+y) for 0 <= x <= y <= 1, which requires careful integration to determine the limits for u. For the second question regarding the moment generating function (mgf) /u(t) = e^(t^2 + 3t), the mean and variance can be calculated by taking derivatives of the mgf and evaluating them at t = 0. The mean is found to be 3 and the variance 2, derived from the relationship between the moments. Understanding these methods clarifies the calculations for both the PDF and the mgf.
silkdigital
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm really stuck on the following questions, not sure as to how to approach it:

Let X and Y be random variables for which the joint pdf is as follows:

f(x,y) = 2(x+y) for 0 <= x <= y <= 1
and 0 otherwise.

Find the pdf of Z = X + Y

And also:

Suppose that X is a random variable for which the mgf is as follows:

/u(t) = e^(t^2 + 3t) for minus infinity < t < infinity

Find the mean and variance for X.
I know that the answers are 3 and 2 respectively, but was unsure how they got to the answer, do I need to integrate by parts?

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks guys :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
silkdigital said:
Hi guys,

I'm really stuck on the following questions, not sure as to how to approach it:

Let X and Y be random variables for which the joint pdf is as follows:

f(x,y) = 2(x+y) for 0 <= x <= y <= 1
and 0 otherwise.

Find the pdf of Z = X + Y

And also:

Suppose that X is a random variable for which the mgf is as follows:

/u(t) = e^(t^2 + 3t) for minus infinity < t < infinity

Find the mean and variance for X.
I know that the answers are 3 and 2 respectively, but was unsure how they got to the answer, do I need to integrate by parts?

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks guys :)

I'll address the second question only. The moments are obtained from the moment generating function by simply taking derivatives and setting t = 0. As you must be aware, the variance is the second moment minus square of first moment.
 
Figured out second question now, pretty straightforward in hindsight. Any help on the first one? ;)
 
silkdigital said:
Figured out second question now, pretty straightforward in hindsight. Any help on the first one? ;)

Have you tried a transformation? Let u = x + y. Now use that transformation to get a integral in terms of u, take into account limits and then use transformation theorem to relate g(u) = 2(x+y) = 2u to another PDF f(u) which represents the distribution of Z.
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
Back
Top