How Do You Find the Residues of Poles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poles
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the equation ##\mathcal{F}(\lambda)=0\ \ \ \forall\ \lambda = \lambda_{n},\ n \in \mathbb{N}##.

I understand that the expression ##\frac{d}{d\lambda}\ \ln\mathcal{F}(\lambda)=\frac{\mathcal{F'(\lambda)}}{\mathcal{F}(\lambda)}## has poles of order 1 exactly at ##\lambda_{n}## because ##\frac{\mathcal{F'(\lambda)}}{\mathcal{F}(\lambda)}=\frac{\mathcal{F'(\lambda)}}{(\lambda- \lambda_{1})...(\lambda-\lambda_{n})}##.

I wonder how I might expand the expression ##\frac{d}{d\lambda}\ \ln\mathcal{F}(\lambda)=\frac{\mathcal{F'(\lambda)}}{\mathcal{F}(\lambda)}## about ##\lambda_{n}## to find out that the residue of the poles is 1.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found out that, expanding about ##\lambda = \lambda_{n}##, with ##\mathcal{F'}(\lambda_{n})\neq0##, we obtain

##\frac{\mathcal{F'}(\lambda)}{\mathcal{F}(\lambda)}=\frac{\mathcal{F'}(\lambda-\lambda_{n}+\lambda_{n})}{\mathcal{F}(\lambda-\lambda_{n}+\lambda_{n})} = \frac{\mathcal{F'}(\lambda_{n})+(\lambda-\lambda_{n})\mathcal{F''}(\lambda_{n})+...}{(\lambda-\lambda_{n})\mathcal{F'}(\lambda_{n})+(\lambda-\lambda_{n})^{2}\mathcal{F''}(\lambda_{n})+...} = \frac{1}{\lambda - \lambda_{n}}+...##,

so that the residue at all eigenvalues is 1.

I took this evaluation out from a paper, so I am not really sure about a couple of things I have written - have we used the Taylor series to expand each of ##\mathcal{F'}(\lambda-\lambda_{n}+\lambda_{n})## and ##\mathcal{F}(\lambda-\lambda_{n}+\lambda_{n})## about ##\lambda=\lambda_{n}##?
 
Frankly, I don't understand what you mean by "expanding about \lambda= \lambda_n because you haven't said what you mean by \lambda_n! Apparently you mean "eigenvalues" but then what do you mean by "eigenvalues" for a function of the complex numbers?

The simplest way to define residues of pole is this: A function, f(z), of a complex variable, has a "pole of order n" at z= z_0 if and only if expanding it in a Laurent series in (z- z_0), the lowest power if (z- z_0)^{-n}. In that case, the residue is the coefficient of (z- z_0)^{-1}.
 
a holomorphic function f(z) with a zero of order n at z=p, equals (z-p)^n times a holomorphic function which is non zero at p, say with value a≠0. Its derivative then has a zero of order n-1 at p, and equals (z-p)^(n-1) times a function with value na at p. hence the quotient f'/f looks like 1/(z-p) times a function with value n at p. + a holomorphic function. Hence the residue at p of f'/f is n, the iorder of the zero at p.

In your case you seem to be assuming the zeroes at the positive integers have order one, so the residue is one at each of them. i.e. you are dividing f' by f = a(z-p) + b(z-p)^2+..., where a≠0. youn can compute this.
 
Back
Top