How do you get the color singlet combination of quarks?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of color singlet combinations of quarks, particularly in relation to the Δ++ particle. Participants explore the implications of SU(3) symmetry and the requirements for constructing color singlet states from quarks, addressing both theoretical and mathematical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Δ++ particle's lack of anti-symmetry in its total wave function necessitates the introduction of color as a degree of freedom, leading to the requirement for color singlet states.
  • Another participant explains that the Δ++ is composed of three identical fermions, each with different colors, and that the total color wave function must be anti-symmetrized to satisfy fermionic statistics.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the derivation of the color singlet from group theory, specifically through the representation theory of SU(3), which describes how to construct singlets from quarks in the fundamental representation.
  • One participant reiterates the connection between the invariant tensor of SU(3) and the construction of the singlet state, indicating that the singlet can be expressed using the Levi-Civita symbol and the quark states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple perspectives on the derivation of the color singlet state, with some focusing on the physical interpretation and others on the mathematical formalism. There is no consensus on a single approach, as different methods and explanations are offered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the need for anti-symmetrization and the role of SU(3) symmetry, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in these derivations or the implications of different representations.

shinwolf14
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I was reading my book and it states that the lack of anti-symmetry in the total wave function of the Δ++ particle led to the introduction of the missing degree of freedom, or color. It states that free particles are colorless so they must be in color singlet states. From there, it just lists the unnormalized anti-symmetric color singlet state as

rbg-rgb+grb-gbr+bgr-brg

I don't understand how they jumped from that statement to the equation. Where does this come from? Does it have to do with SU(3) symmetry? Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a very simple idea: the ##\Delta^{++}## is made by three identical particle with all the same quantum numbers except for color. Since they are all identical fermions and none of the possible 3 pairs can be in the exact same state this means that the color of each of them must be different from that of the others (i.e. rbg). However, you also know that the total colo wave function must be anti-symmetric and so you need to anti-symmetrize the rbg state with respect to all possible exchange of two particles. This gives the color wave function that you wrote.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
It's of course also derivable from group theory, although it's not necessary here because of Einj 's explanation.

The representation theory of SU(3), however tells you how to build singlets in terms of its various representations. For quarks the color group is realized in the socalled fundamental representiation, i.e., in the vector space ##\mathbb{C}^3##. There are two non-equivalent three-dimensional representations of SU(3), which is given by the fundamental and the conjugate complex representation (in the more familiar case of SU(2) these two representations are equivalent).

If you have only quarks, i.e., only the fundamental representation, SU(3) representation theory tells you that you need three quarks, and the only way to build a color singlet is to use the totally antisymmetric product state for the color-degree of freedom. The final result, explained by Einj is thus unique.
 
shinwolf14 said:
I was reading my book and it states that the lack of anti-symmetry in the total wave function of the Δ++ particle led to the introduction of the missing degree of freedom, or color. It states that free particles are colorless so they must be in color singlet states. From there, it just lists the unnormalized anti-symmetric color singlet state as

rbg-rgb+grb-gbr+bgr-brg

I don't understand how they jumped from that statement to the equation. Where does this come from? Does it have to do with SU(3) symmetry? Any help would be greatly appreciated
In any group, a singlet is obtained by contracting (relevant) tensors with the appropriate invariant tensor of the group. So, for [itex]SU_{c}(3)[/itex] the invariant tensor is [itex]\epsilon_{i j k}[/itex] and the 3-quark tensor in the question is [itex]T^{i j k} = q^{i} q^{j} q^{k}[/itex], where [itex]q^{1} = r , \ \ q^{2} = b , \ \ q^{3} = g[/itex]. Therefore [tex]\Delta^{+ +} = \epsilon_{i j k} q^{i} q^{j} q^{k} .[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K