How Do You Integrate w/(w^4 + 1)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chubb rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is attempting to integrate the function w/(w^4 + 1). The discussion revolves around integration techniques and substitutions within the context of calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers substituting w^4 + 1 with u but encounters issues with the numerator. They also contemplate transforming the integrand into a form suitable for arctangent integration. Other participants suggest using integration by parts and ordinary substitutions, discussing the implications of these methods.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various substitution methods and integration techniques. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of substitutions, and there is a collaborative effort to clarify the relationships between variables in the context of the integration process.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the correct form of the substitution and the need to maintain the integrity of the original function during the integration process. The discussion reflects an ongoing exploration of these concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

chubb rock
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm supposed to integrate w/w^4 + 1

The two ideas I'd come up with was trying to substitute w^4+1 with u but that results in a 0 in the numerator.

Then I thought maybe I have to put w/w^4+1 into the 1/1+w^2 form and integrate into 1/k tan^-1kx + C but I'm not sure how to keep the original function while making the w^4 a w^2.

Help please? Am I at least going in the right direction with any of these ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use integration by parts. You'll have to do it twice.

EDIT: Mark44's way is better, ignore this.
 
You're going in the right direction thinking of tan-1(x).

An ordinary substitution should do the trick: u = x2, so du = 2xdx. Then your integrand becomes roughly du/(u2 + 1). Notice the parentheses I added to make clear what the denominator is. You'll also need to add the right constant multiplier in the numerator, since I omitted it.
 
Does that mean I can substitute just the variable and leave the "+ 1"? That is substitute u as w^2 getting u^2 = u^4?
 
You mean u2 = w4.
 
Yes. The substitution is u = w2, so u2 = w4, and du = 2wdw.
 
Oh, yeah. Typo. That's what I meant.

Awesome, thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K