Consider a one dimensional gauge theory where the field has mass. The term,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]m^{2}A^{\mu}A_{\mu}[/tex]

is the conventional mass term. What if you find terms in your Unified Field Theory lagrangian of the form

[tex]M_{\mu\nu}A^{\mu}A^{\nu}[/tex] ?

In this case [tex]M_{\mu\nu}[/tex] is constant.

When it is not the case that

[tex]M_{\mu\nu}[/tex]

is of the form

[tex]m^{2}g_{\mu\nu}[/tex] ,

are these to be interpreted as self-interaction terms, or self-interaction terms somehow related to mass for the gauge field, or as bona fide mass terms?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How do you interpret quadratic terms in the gauge field in a Lagrangian?

Loading...

Similar Threads for interpret quadratic terms | Date |
---|---|

I Interpreting K-minus decay | Nov 11, 2017 |

I Why are free-field Lagrangians quadratic in fields? | May 1, 2017 |

I Interpreting CMS and ATLAS results | Jun 20, 2016 |

A Signal strength parameter (interpretation) | May 13, 2016 |

Help interpreting processed data (and their transforms) | Feb 22, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**