How do you know which field in maths is for you or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
Enjoyment of mathematics often correlates with a preference for specific areas within the field. Individuals can gauge their interests by paying attention to their engagement during lectures and their performance in classes. Taking courses in various mathematical subjects can help identify what resonates most. Success typically follows when one enjoys a subject and possesses a natural aptitude for it. Ultimately, exploring different areas can lead to discovering the right mathematical field for research or further study.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
I don't know about you, but I get a feeling that anyone who enjoys maths tend to enjoy all areas of maths. However some areas will be preferred more then others. The question is how can one tell? i.e How can one tell which area one should go into (to do as research for instance)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I know for me, if I find myself actually paying attention to what the professor is saying and not just blindly copying down the notes then I like that subject.
 
One usually knows it by what interests you.
 
I think the easiest way is to take a class in the subject and see if you enjoy it and do well. Usually, but not always, you'll succeed if you (a) naturally enjoy it and (b) seem to have a natural ability for it.
 
Throw the dice and let chance determine your preferrable field.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top