How Do You Prove a Sigma Notation Equality Using Induction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the equality of a sigma notation involving the expression 2n-1 and the summation of (3i+1) for all positive integers n. The initial proof attempt confirms the base case for n=1. The next step involves assuming the formula holds for n=m and demonstrating it for n=m+1, leading to the formulation of the summation. A key hint provided helps clarify the necessary steps to derive the proof, specifically how to handle the terms for m+1. The participant expresses gratitude for the guidance that ultimately aids in understanding the proof process.
jesusjones
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2n-1
Sigma (3i+1) = n(6n-1)
i=0

prove for all positive n


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It holds true for n=1

5=5

then P: m+1

2m+1
Sigma(3i+1) = (m+1)(6(m+1)-1) or 6m^2 + 11m + 5
i=0

then 2m+1
Sigma(3i+1) = m(6m-1) + (3(m+1)+1) + (3(m+2)+1) = 6m^2 + 5m + 11
i=0

I just cannot figure this out and it is driving me crazy. Please help clarify things. I even tried changing the first part to
2m
Ʃ(3(i-1)+1)
i=1

and still couldn't prove it.

Thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jesusjones said:

Homework Statement



2n-1
Sigma (3i+1) = n(6n-1)
i=0

prove for all positive n

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



It holds true for n=1

5=5
...
Hello jesusjones. Welcome to PF.

Now, assume that it holds for n = m, (where m ≥ 1), so you assume the following is true.
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m-1}(3i+1)= m(6m-1)\,.​
With that assumption, you now need to show that this formulation is true for n = m+1. In this case, 2n-1 = 2(m+1)-1 = 2m+1, and n(6n-1)= (m+1)(6m+5)= 6m2+11m+5 . In other words, show that the following can be derived from the above.
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m+1}(3i+1) = (m+1)(6m+5)\,.​

Here's a hint:
\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{2m+1}(3i+1)=(3(2m)+1)+(3(2m+1)+1)+\sum_{i=0}^{2m-1}(3i+1)\,.​
 
Thank you SammyS for your reply your hint lead me to the proper proof. I was having a hard time figuring out why it would be (3(2m)+1) and (3(2m+1)+1) instead of just (3(m+1)+1) ect... But i think i get it now.

Thanks very much
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top