How Do You Prove Minimum Vertex Degree in Graph Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ych22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach
ych22
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I was attempting a simple graph theory question.

"Let G=(V,E) be a simple graph with n>=3 vertices and 2n-3 edges. Suppose that every subgraph with m(>=2) vertices has <= 2m-3 edges. Let S be the minimum degree for any vertex in V. Prove that S is either 2 or 3."

So I let A be the statement "G=(V,E) is a simple graph with... has <= 2m-3 edges."
Let B be the statement "S is the minimum degree...either 2 or 3".

Is my job to prove that A->B? Can I prove ~B->~A instead? That is, I want to show that if S is 0,1, or >3 then G cannot be a ... with every subgraph with ...

I am self-learning discrete maths and have some uncertainty in propositional logic.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, proving a statement by proving its contrapositive (proving "A implies B" by proving "not B implies not A") is a standard method of proof.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top