How Do You Quantize Spinor Theory in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jan Paniev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin Schroeder
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on quantizing the spinor theory from Peskin & Schroeder's textbook, specifically addressing the challenge of finding the correct expansions and normalizations to diagonalize the Hamiltonian. The Majorana mass equation and the anticommutation relations for the spinor components are highlighted as critical elements of the problem. A suggestion is made to consult Giunti & Kim's "Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics & Astrophysics" for guidance, particularly regarding the treatment of the Hamiltonian. It is emphasized that the partial derivative in the Hamiltonian must act on both sides, which is often overlooked in standard methods. Overall, the conversation seeks solutions and resources to effectively tackle the quantization of the spinor theory.
Jan Paniev
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem 3.4e of Peskin & Schroeder Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Quantize the spinor theory of item (a) of this exercise, where the spinor \chi is the first two components of the Dirac spinor (\psi_L). Find a Hermitean Hamiltonian and the correct creation/annihilation operators that diagonalize it.

Homework Equations


The Majorana mass equation for these components \[i\bar{\sigma}\cdot\partial\chi=im\sigma^2\chi^*\]
(item a), the anticommutation relations for the components of the spinor
\[\{\chi_a(x),\chi^\dagger_b(y) \}=\delta_{ab}\delta(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\].

The Attempt at a Solution


Many. The problem is that I cannot find the correct expansions of the fields and the correct normalizations to diagonalize the Hamiltonian. The fact that the equations mix \chi with \chi^\dagger doesn't allow to use the usual methods and I could not find this done in any book. Pointing to a book or a partial/full solution in the internet would already be a great help. General suggestions and tips are also very, very welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're presumably not still working on this, but see Giunti & Kim's Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics & Astrophysics, section 6.2.5. The key is that after writing the Hamiltonian as chi^dagger partial_0 chi, the partial_0 acts both to the left and to the right (which is often skipped over in P&S, which is usually but not always valid). Here, it's important to cancelling the aa and a^dagger a^dagger terms. (Strictly speaking, the Hamiltonian with the partial_0 acting in both directions differs from the Hamiltonian with it acting in one direction by a surface term.)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top