How Do You Set Up Integrals in Polar Coordinates for Volume Calculation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sparky_
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around setting up integrals in polar coordinates for calculating the volume of a cone defined by the equation r = 3sin(θ) within a sphere described by x² + y² + z² = 9. Participants explore the appropriate limits for the integrals and the implications of using polar coordinates versus Cartesian coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the limits of integration, initially suggesting θ should range from 0 to 2π, but later realizes this is incorrect after plotting the function.
  • Another participant points out that the equation r = 3sin(θ) describes a cylinder when transformed into Cartesian coordinates, prompting a discussion about the geometric interpretation of the shapes involved.
  • There is a suggestion that drawing a clear picture of the problem could help avoid confusion regarding the limits of integration.
  • One participant mentions the instinct to double the integral when dealing with sinusoidal functions, questioning whether this approach is valid in polar coordinates.
  • A later reply proposes a method of breaking the volume into smaller pieces based on symmetry, suggesting limits for θ from 0 to π/2 and for r from 0 to 3sin(θ).
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of transforming the equation of the sphere into polar coordinates to correctly set the limits for z.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for clarification regarding the limits of integration in polar coordinates, but multiple competing views on the best approach and understanding of the problem remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct limits for integration and the implications of using polar coordinates versus Cartesian coordinates. There are also unresolved mathematical steps related to the integration process.

Sparky_
Messages
227
Reaction score
5
Greetings,

I somewhat see the explanation but I need a conversation to clear the fog.

Part of a larger problem is this integral:

Find the volume of a cone [tex]r = 3sin(theta)[/tex] inside the sphere [tex]x^2 +y^2 + z^2 = 9[/tex]


[tex] \int \int \int r \,dz dr dtheta[/tex]

My limits:
z goes from 0 to [tex]\sqrt{9-r^2}[/tex] with the integral multiplied by “2” to handle the +/- side of the square-root

r goes from 0 to 3 sin(theta)

and initially I had theta going from 0 to 2pi.

First integration:

[tex] \int \int r\sqrt{9-r^2}\, dr dtheta[/tex]

r from 0 to 3sin(theta)
theta from 0 to 2pi – again initially – I reasoned that this is not correct

Second integration:

[tex] -\frac{2}{3} \int (9-r^2)^{2/3}\, dtheta[/tex]

r from 0 to sin(theta)

[tex] -\frac{2}{3} \int (9-9sin(theta)^2)^{2/3} - -9^{3/2}\, dtheta[/tex]

With my limits from 0 to 2pi – wrong answer – I said “Ah the area under a sinusoidal – so 2 * the same integral from 0 to pi”

Wrong again

I then plot the polar plot of r = 3 sin(theta) and make a table and see that at pi/2 I get the first half of the “circle” polar plot.

So I said, “Ah 4* the integral from 0 to pi/2 to get all the way back to 2pi” – see I had 2pi on the brain.

Again – wrong answer, so I see that the plot completes the “circle” polar plot when the angle gets to pi.

So when I multiply the integral by 2 and go from 0 to pi/2 I get it.

Can you help clear the fog?

When I see an integral of a sinusoid, my first instinct was to multiply the integral by 2 and then integrate from 0 to pi.

I assume this is “Cartesian-thinking?”

Next, I want to say when working with polar coordinates, that the angle should “sweep” all the way around from 0 to 2pi.

I know the answer is associated with the plot of “r” – should one always generate a plot to see how “r” goes or is there a more straightforward way to set up the integral?

Thanks
Sparky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cone? r=3sin\theta

Check that.
r^2=3rsin\theta
x^2+y^2=3y on x-y plane
Care to guess it is a cylinder? [Complete the square]

So where is my bonus? Even a raise? Forget tenure...
 
yes I meant cylinder

the r = 3sin(theta) is correct.

More than anything I'm wanting clarification and further explanation on setting up the limits with polar coordinates.

Meaning - you see my first thought was to have theta go from 0 to 2pi.

Then when I proceeded I had an integral involving sinusoidal functions so I said "double" the integral from 0 to pi.

It wasn't until I plotted the graph and did a simple table (theta vs. r) that I saw that it's 2 times the integral from 0 to pi/2.

did I miss an easier way to "see" this problem.

What burned me was the integrating sin and it not being 2 times the integral from 0 to pi - like in Cartesian coordinates.

Help?
 
Hello Sparky_,

The way to tackle these problems is first of all to draw a clear picture. In doing so you have to think already what the behaviour is of the equations of the shapes you have and thus you would have avoided the [itex]2 \pi[/itex] issue. Then try to see if there are any symmetry planes and if so split the volume up into smaller pieces of equal size so you only need to determine one part and mostly a simpler integral is a consequence. In this case I would say there are 4 pieces, 1 above the XY plane and 1 below, each of these latter ones cutted up in two smaller ones by the YZ plane. In order to set up the limits of the integrals try to find out what comes last. In this case it would be the [itex]\theta[/itex] dependency and the limits are now [itex]0\leq \theta \leq \pi/2[/itex] which you can see from your picture. After that it would be the r dependency having limits [itex]0\leq r \leq 3sin(\theta )[/itex]. The first integral to solve would be the one for the height z and the limits can be obtained from the equation of the sphere. You need to transform it into polar coordinates. [itex]x^2+y^2=r^2[/itex], so these are [itex]0 \leq z \leq \sqrt{9-r^2}[/itex]. The integral looks now as:

[tex]V=4 \cdot \int_{0}^{\pi/2} \int_{0}^{3sin(\theta)} \int_{0}^{\sqrt{9-r^2}} dz \cdot r \cdot dr \cdot d\theta[/tex]

The evaluation is up to you, I'm going to bed it's very late over here :-)

Hope this helps,

coomast
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K