How Do You Solve This Moving Average Representation Problem in Time Series?

Kinetica
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
I really need your help if you are good in time series. I have a problem on moving average representations. I attach the problem description; also, I attach my attempt to solve it. Cannot go any further. Please please help me.
Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • problem.JPG
    problem.JPG
    30.9 KB · Views: 537
  • solution.png
    solution.png
    2.5 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
W_t = \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} y_{t-1} \\ x_{t-1} \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e_t \\ z_t \end{bmatrix}

W_t = \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix}\big{(} \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} y_{t-2} \\ x_{t-2} \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} e_{t-1} \\ z_{t-1} \end{bmatrix} \big{)} +\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e_t \\ z_t \end{bmatrix}

W_t = \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} y_{t-2} \\ x_{t-2} \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e_{t-1} \\ z_{t-1} \end{bmatrix} +\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} e_t \\ z_t \end{bmatrix}

So C_0 = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}
and C_1 = \begin{bmatrix} .7 & -.4 \\ .8 & 0 \end{bmatrix}
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top