How Does a Bicycle's Friction Drive Work?

AI Thread Summary
The roller on the bicycle tire spins counterclockwise, generating a tangential force that contributes to the tire's rotation. This force is internal to the bicycle system, with the roller helping to drive the tire forward. At the contact point between the tire and the pavement, the tire pushes backward while the pavement exerts a forward force on the tire. Ultimately, it is this forward force from the pavement that propels the motorized bicycle forward. Understanding these forces is crucial for grasping how a bicycle's friction drive operates.
twistedmind
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anybody help me with these forces, I appreciate the effort.
The roller shown sitting on top of the circle which is the bictcle tire is spinning counterclockwise imparting a tangential force on the bicycle wheel.
Is the roller creating the force to drive the wheel forward, or is the entire assembly moving the bicycle forward?
whas that question too long?
thanks
 

Attachments

  • forces.jpg
    forces.jpg
    9.8 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the roller, assembly, and bicycle tire are all connected as a unit, the roller is applying an "internal" (within the bicycle system) force to cause the tire to rotate. At the contact patch between tire and pavement, the tire exerts a backwards force onto the pavement, coexistant with pavement exerting a forwards force onto the tire.

It's the pavement's forward force that propels the motorized bicycle forwards.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top