How does a cockroft walton multiplier work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thundagere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The Cockcroft-Walton multiplier operates by using diodes and capacitors to increase voltage through a series of stages. When connected to an AC power source, the diodes allow current to flow in a way that charges each capacitor sequentially, effectively stacking their voltages. Each capacitor charges to a voltage that adds to the previous one, resulting in an output voltage that can be significantly higher than the input. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the flow of current and the role of AC input, as well as the potential for using a rectifier to convert AC to DC before applying the multiplier. Overall, the Cockcroft-Walton multiplier is a straightforward yet effective method for voltage multiplication.
Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Could someone help me out? I've looked at the two following diagrams:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Cockcroft_Walton_Voltage_multiplier.png
Full wave multiplier
I'm not understanding how it works in terms of current flow and such. COuld someone explain this? Also, what's the difference between these two setups insofar as how well they work? I understand that it has something to do with using diodes to send the current in a specific way, and then charging capacitors in each stage, but beyond that, I'm not sure.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google is your friend. I got about 12,400 results in (0.24 seconds) using the search terms “cockroft walton multiplier”. I selected these two for you. No spoon-feeding here on PF. You must go to these sites and study and learn yourself. If then you have any questions or doubts, return here and post them. Good luck.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockcroft–Walton_generator
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_3/8.html

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited:
Been there done that :). I stared at this image for about 10 minutes before coming here.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Cockcroft_Walton_Voltage_multiplier.png
To be more specific, here in this image. THe power source charges the top left capacitor, but how does this effect stack up to add to the voltage? There's a path from the voltage source to every capacitor, so every capacitor is charged, but do the capacitors then charge each other? Is that why the "stacking" effect works? I feel like I'm missing something as far as the overall swing of things is.
Also, does the current source have to be AC current? This diagram shows it like so, but could you use a rectifier and an AC source to convert, say, 120 volts of AC wall current to 168 volts DC, then use a Cockroft-Walton multiplier to stack the 168 volts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Been where, done what? Staring at a schematic diagram seems an unlikely method to learn the theory of operation.

At the Wiki site mentioned above, the words "Operation of the CW multiplier, or any voltage doubler, is quite simple. Considering the simple two-stage version diagramed within, which is attached to an AC power source on the left side of the diagram. At the time when the AC input reaches its negative pole the leftmost diode is allowing current to flow from the ground into the first capacitor, filling it up. When the same AC signal reverses polarity, current flows through the second diode filling up the second capacitor with both the positive end from AC source and the first capacitor, charging the second capacitor to twice the charge held in the first. With each change in polarity of the input, the capacitors add to the upstream charge and boost the voltage level of the capacitors downstream, towards the output on the right. The output voltage, assuming perfect conditions, is twice the peak input voltage multiplied by the number of stages in the multiplier." seem to explain the workings of the CW multiplier fairly well.

Have you studied the first section in the above "all about circuits" site? It provides a simplified theory of operation.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
I honestly didn't see that section in the link you gave me. At any rate that site seems really good for this, so I'll give it another go. Thanks!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top