How Does a Diagonal Metric Affect the Symmetry and Tensor Equations in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funzies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Space
Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! I am considering a space with a diagonal metric, which is maximally symmetric.

It can be proven that in that case of a diagonal metric the following equations for the Christoffel symbols hold:
\Gamma^{\gamma}_{\alpha \beta} = 0
\Gamma^{\beta}_{\alpha \alpha} = -(1/g_{\beta\beta})\partial_{\beta}g_{\alpha\alpha}
\Gamma^{\beta}_{\alpha \beta} = \partial_{\alpha}\ln(\sqrt{|g_{\beta\beta}|})
\Gamma^{\alpha}_{\alpha \alpha} = \partial_{\alpha}\ln(\sqrt{|g_{\alpha\alpha}|})

Furthermore: for a maximally symmetric space we have for the Riemann tensor:
R_{\rho\sigma\mu\nu} = R/12(g_{\rho\mu}g_{\sigma\nu}-g_{\rho\nu}g_{\sigma\mu}), where R is the Ricci scalar.

Given these equations, I come across a contradiction. From the above equation for the Riemann tensor we easily see that if it has three different indices, it must be zero (IF the metric is diagonal). However, if I plug in the Christoffelsymbols into the definition of the Riemanntensor expressed in Christoffel symbols and their derivatives, I do not find that this is zero in general. Does anyone know what is going wrong here?

EDIT: For a maximally symmetric space, three indices cannot be unequal, but for a diagonal space this might not be the case. How is this all related?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I put the following diagonal line element into GrTensor, for coordinates (t,x,y,z),

-p(t,x,y,z)*d[t]^2+q(t,x,y,z)*d[x]^2+r(t,x,y,z)*d[y]^2+s(t,x,y,z)*d[z]^2;

I get the following (just a partial set).

\Gamma^t{}_{tt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial_t \, p}{p}
\Gamma^x{}_{tt} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial_x \, p}{q}
\Gamma^t{}_{xt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial_x \, p}{p}

They look similar, except for a missing factor of 1/2. The ln's complicate things a bit - are they really that useful?

I was rather surprised to see an apparently non_zero term pop out for R_txty myself. I'm not sure if it's really nonzero, or just didn't simplify:

R_{txty} = 1/4\,{\frac {-2\, \left( {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial y}}<br /> p \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) p \left( t,x,y,z \right) q \left( t,<br /> x,y,z \right) r \left( t,x,y,z \right) + \left( {\frac {\partial }{<br /> \partial y}}p \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) \left( {\frac {<br /> \partial }{\partial x}}p \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) q \left( t,x,<br /> y,z \right) r \left( t,x,y,z \right) + \left( {\frac {\partial }{<br /> \partial x}}p \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) \left( {\frac {<br /> \partial }{\partial y}}q \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) p \left( t,x,<br /> y,z \right) r \left( t,x,y,z \right) + \left( {\frac {\partial }{<br /> \partial y}}p \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) \left( {\frac {<br /> \partial }{\partial x}}r \left( t,x,y,z \right) \right) p \left( t,x,<br /> y,z \right) q \left( t,x,y,z \right) }{p \left( t,x,y,z \right) q<br /> \left( t,x,y,z \right) r \left( t,x,y,z \right) }}<br />
 
When you say "maximally symmetric space" and "diagonal space," you're talking about two different kinds of things. The symmetry is intrinsic, but the diagonal form of the metric is coordinate-dependent.

I think the only maximally symmetric spaces in 3+1 dimensions are Minkowski space, de Sitter space, and anti de Sitter space. Have you tried, for example, checking your calculations in the special case of de Sitter space?

Funzies said:
From the above equation for the Riemann tensor we easily see that if it has three different indices, it must be zero (IF the metric is diagonal).
What if the different components of the metric are unequal?

Funzies said:
EDIT: For a maximally symmetric space, three indices cannot be unequal, but for a diagonal space this might not be the case. How is this all related?
Are you thinking that the different components of the metric have to be equal because it's maximally symmetric? That's not true. The symmetry doesn't have to be manifest when you write the metric in certain coordinates.
 
Given the line element, I don't see any requirement that there be ANY Killing vectors, much less the maximum possible number (which would be a requirement to be maximally symmetric space, if I understand correctly).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top