How Does a Falling Ladder Affect the Impact Force on a 200 Pound Man?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bpatterson9671
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impact force experienced by a 200-pound man falling from a 10-foot ladder, comparing the scenarios of riding the ladder down versus falling straight down. It highlights the importance of conservation of mechanical energy and the calculation of velocity at impact, emphasizing that the ladder's mass can be ignored for simplicity. The force exerted by the ladder on the man is perpendicular to his motion, making the problem analogous to other physics scenarios like roller coasters and pendulums. The trajectory of the man changes from circular to parabolic as the ladder pivots, affecting the impact dynamics. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining the impact force in both scenarios.
bpatterson9671
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This problem came up in discussion - If a 200 pound man was on the top of a 10 foot ladder, and the ladder fell in an arc to the ground, Would the force of impact on the man be less if he "road" the ladder down to the ground on the arc, or if he fell straight down 10 feet separate from the ladder? We are debating this at work and I am trying to come up with the physics behind this. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bpatterson9671 said:
This problem came up in discussion - If a 200 pound man was on the top of a 10 foot ladder, and the ladder fell in an arc to the ground, Would the force of impact on the man be less if he "road" the ladder down to the ground on the arc, or if he fell straight down 10 feet separate from the ladder? We are debating this at work and I am trying to come up with the physics behind this. Any help?
If you ignore the mass of the ladder, you can treat this as a simple conservation problem. What is conserved? What is the velocity of the poor guy (magnitude and direction) when he hits the ground? Which component(s) of his velocity will result in doing him harm?
 
I would ignore the mass of the ladder (lets assume it is a really light aluminum one), and I have the equation F = mv , however, I am having a difficult time with the arc velocity calculation. I can calculate the straight line fall due to gravity, but I am not sure of the other.
 
bpatterson9671 said:
I would ignore the mass of the ladder (lets assume it is a really light aluminum one), and I have the equation F = mv , however, I am having a difficult time with the arc velocity calculation. I can calculate the straight line fall due to gravity, but I am not sure of the other.
The force the ladder exerts on the man is perpendicular to his motion. That makes this problem like masses sliding down surfaces, plane or otherwise, roller coasters, pendulums, etc. Mechanical energy is conserved. You can find the velocity at any height using energy conservation. You can find the direction of the velocity using the motion of the ladder.

If you wanted to be a bit more precise, you would recognize that even if the bottom of the ladder were against a wall, at some angle the ladder would lose contact with the wall and start moving horizontally. The man's path would change from circular to parabolic. Assume first that the bottom of the ladder is constrained to not move, only pivot. Add the possibility of it moving later if you want.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top