How does a mass moving up a ramp change its velocity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a point mass transitioning from a horizontal plane to an inclined ramp. It establishes that the mass retains its speed while changing direction due to an impulse exerted by the ramp, which alters its momentum. The angle of the impulse is crucial, being directed at an angle of 90 - θ/2 from the ground to maintain speed. The conversation also explores the mathematical relationships between impulse, momentum, and velocity, particularly in the context of forces acting parallel and perpendicular to the ramp.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles, specifically impulse and momentum.
  • Familiarity with vector decomposition in physics.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in physics.
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving mass, velocity, and force.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of impulse in detail, focusing on its mathematical formulation.
  • Learn about momentum conservation in different reference frames.
  • Explore the effects of inclined planes on motion, including frictionless scenarios.
  • Investigate the relationship between angle of incidence and reflection in elastic collisions.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion on inclined surfaces.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
A point mass is moving at speed v, on a horizontal plane, until it reaches an incline. Immediately, its direction changes, but its speed remains at v. How does this happen?
Relevant Equations
Understanding of forces
A point mass is moving at speed v, on a horizontal plane, until it reaches an incline. Immediately after just climbing up the incline, its speed remains at v, but its direction changes. How does this happen?

Q2: Now, I drop a point mass such that it falls vertically downward onto a fixed ramp.
Is only velocity parallel to the slope of the ramp preserved? I think this is because the ramp exerts an impulse on the ball such that the momentum perpendicular to the slope is removed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
I think this is because the ramp exerts an impulse on the ball such that the momentum perpendicular to the slope is removed.
I think the concept of impulse is useful for this problem. Can you show us some equations involving impulse, momentum, mass and velocity? Can you then write the equations for the two parts of the question?
 
berkeman said:
I think the concept of impulse is useful for this problem. Can you show us some equations involving impulse, momentum, mass and velocity? Can you then write the equations for the two parts of the question?
@BvU
For Q1:
I am trying to see the transition onto the incline as a round curve. I believe it collides with the ramp, and so there is some force between the mass and the ramp, which leads to an impulse on the mass. Let's say the angle of the ramp is ##\theta##.

It seems, that for the velocity vector v to change direction but retain its magnitude, the impulse must be directed at an angle ## 90 - \frac {\theta} {2}## from the ground. This would give a resultant velocity with magnitude same as before and angled at ##\theta##. May I know why the angle of the impulse is ## 90 - \frac {\theta} {2}##, instead of perpendicular to the slope (ie ## 90 - \theta ##)
 
phantomvommand said:
I am trying to see the transition onto the incline as a round curve
Yes, that is one way it is possible for speed to be maintained (initially). But that is not a single impact, more like an infinite sequence of tiny impacts.
If we assume a point particle and a smooth curve of radius r then the only loss of speed results from the climb of ##r(1-\cos(\theta)##. As we make r vanishingly small, that tends to zero.
Alternatively, it could be, say, a short ramp at angle ##\theta/2## followed immediately by the main ramp at angle ##\theta##. An elastic bounce off the short ramp does the trick.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
phantomvommand said:
It seems, that for the velocity vector v to change direction but retain its magnitude, the impulse must be directed at an angle ## 90 - \frac {\theta} {2}## from the ground. This would give a resultant velocity with magnitude same as before and angled at ##\theta##. May I know why the angle of the impulse is ## 90 - \frac {\theta} {2}##, instead of perpendicular to the slope (ie ## 90 - \theta ##)

Say a particle is traveling along the ##x## axis at a speed ##v##, until it reaches the origin at ##t=0## and is subject to a kick ##F(t) = I\delta(t)## parallel to the ##y## axis. It's momentum in the ##y## direction changes as ##\Delta p_y = I \int \delta(t) dt = I## and it obtains a speed ##v_y = I / m## in the ##y## direction. Its direction has changed by an angle ##\theta = \mathrm{arctan}\left( I/ mv \right)##. Except, its speed is now ##v' = \sqrt{v^2 + v_y^2} \geq v##.

What if you fixed this by kicking it with an additional force ##G(t) = -J \delta(t)## parallel to the ##x## axis? It's momentum in the ##x## direction changes as ##\Delta p_x = -J## and its speed in the ##x## direction reduces to ##v_x = v - J/m##. The total speed of the particle is then\begin{align*}
v' = \sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2} = \sqrt{v^2 - 2vJ/m + J^2/m^2 + I^2 / m^2}
\end{align*}If the speed has not changed, ##v' = v##, then the condition relating ##I## and ##J## is ##J^2 -2mvJ + I^2 = 0##,\begin{align*}\implies J &= \dfrac{2mv - \sqrt{4 m^2 v^2 - 4I^2}}{2} = mv - \sqrt{m^2 v^2 - I^2}
\end{align*}The smaller root is taken since ##I, J \leq mv##. The speed in the ##x## direction, in terms of ##I##, would be\begin{align*}
v_x = \sqrt{v^2 - I^2/m^2}
\end{align*}The particle travels at an angle ##\theta## which satisfies\begin{align*}
\tan \theta = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{m^2 v^2/I^2 - 1}} \equiv \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\kappa^2 -1}} \\
\end{align*}where ##\kappa \equiv mv/I##. Meanwhile, the total impulse ##(-J, I)## applied to the ball was at an angle of ##\theta_\mathrm{im}## to the vertical, with\begin{align*}
\tan \theta_\mathrm{im} = J/I = \kappa - \sqrt{\kappa^2 - 1}
\end{align*}What can you say about the angles ##\theta## and ##\theta_{\mathrm{im}}##? Is this what you expect, by symmetry?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K