How Does a Pole Vaulter's Center of Gravity Affect Maximum Jump Height?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how a pole vaulter's center of gravity (COG) influences their maximum jump height. A 70kg vaulter running at 9.5 m/s can theoretically clear a height of 4.9m based on energy conservation, but adding the COG height of 90cm raises the potential maximum to 5.8m. The energy conversion process involves kinetic energy being transformed into potential energy as the pole bends and then lifts the vaulter. The COG is crucial because it indicates how high the vaulter can lift their body during the jump, allowing for adjustments in body shape to clear higher than the calculated height. Understanding these dynamics is essential for optimizing pole vaulting performance.
clipperdude21
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
1. A 70kg pole vaulter runs with a top speed of 9.5 m/s. During the jump the pole is highly curved then straigtens out. The vaulter is able to clear a bar height of 5.4m
a) Using conservation of energy, determine the maximum height the vaulter should be able to clear. The vaulters center of gravity point is 90cm above his feet.
b) Discuss the energy conversions that take place.




2. K=.5mv^2, Ug=mgh



3. (a) .5mv^2=mgh. I got h is equal to 4.9m but I added the center of gravity point to make it 5.8 m. Is this right? why do we add the COG point?
(b) Kinetic energy transforms to energy into the bending the pole, the pole then converts the energy into gravitational potential energy by raising you a height H.



Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
clipperdude21 said:
why do we add the COG point?

Because the energy equations allow you to predict how far the running vaulter, given a perfect vaulting technique, has the energy to lift their COG.

Taking the vaulter as a point (in which case how can their COG be above their feet?!), adding the height of the COG gives you an indication of the height the vaulter should be able to clear.

Taking the vaulter as having size and an adjustable shape, the vaulter can adjust their shape and thus put their COG below the part of their body that is passing over the bar. This allows the vaulter to clear higher than predicted by converting KE to GPE and adding the height of COG above ground when running. The question does not give any data allowing you to compute this third term of the height the vaulter should be able to clear.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top