How Does a Rotating Metallic Bar Generate a Potential Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating
AI Thread Summary
A rotating metallic bar generates a potential difference due to the displacement of electrons under centrifugal force, which affects their distribution compared to protons. To calculate this potential difference, key factors include the bar's length, mass, volumetric density, resistance, and angular velocity. The discussion references Richard Tolman's 1916 experiment as a relevant resource for understanding this phenomenon. Clarification was provided regarding the term "ddp," which stands for "Diferença De Potencial" in Portuguese. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between rotation and electrical potential in conductive materials.
DaTario
Messages
1,096
Reaction score
46
rotating metalic bar and potential difference

Hi All,

I have been thinking of this lately and had no answer.

Consider we have a metalic bar rotating around one of its ends. Centrifugal force will appear inside the bar. It seems natural to think that electrons will suffer larger displacements than protons. Thus a potential difference seems to arise. If all this is correct, what do we need (complementary information, for instance) in order to calculate the potential difference from:

the length L
the mass
the volumetric density
the resistance
the angular velocity.

?

Best wishes

DaTario
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't know what you mean with ddp.

Despite i suggest that you take a look at the experiment which Richard Tolman conducted in 1916. That would have led you in the right direction.
 


saunderson said:
i don't know what you mean with ddp.

Sorry, I used a portuguese shortage for potential difference (Diferença De Potencial). I have it corrected now in the OP.

Thank you ( I will search for this reference Tolman).

Best Wishes

DaTario
 
Last edited:
saunderson said:
Despite i suggest that you take a look at the experiment which Richard Tolman conducted in 1916. That would have led you in the right direction.

Thank you.

Nice reference.

Best Wishes


DaTario
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top